Literature DB >> 23295451

Video-assisted vs open mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Emanuel Palade1, Bernward Passlick, Thomas Osei-Agyemang, Jutta Günter, Sebastian Wiesemann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Since the introduction of video-assisted lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) into clinical practice, it has been discussed controversially whether mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed as effectively as an open procedure via thoracotomy. Therefore, we address this issue in a prospective randomized trial conducted in our institution.
METHODS: In total, 66 patients with completely staged clinical Stage I NSCLC were included and randomized either into a video-assisted group (n = 34) or into the conventional lobectomy group (n = 32). The video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy was performed by using a 4- to 5-cm utility incision in the fourth or fifth intercostal space and two additional 10-mm ports without rib spreading. The conventional lobectomy was done via an anterolateral thoracotomy. Lymph nodes were classified according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer classification; for right-sided tumours, lymph nodes number 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were dissected, and for left-sided tumours, lymph nodes number 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. For the subsequent analyses, lymph nodes were grouped into different zones consisting of Zone 1 (2R and 4R), Zone 2 (7), Zone 3 (8R and 9R), Zone 4 (10R, 11 R and 12R), Zone 5 (4 L), Zone 6 (5 and 6), Zone 7 (8L and 9L) and Zone 8 (10 L, 11 L and 12L).
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to different clinical pathological parameters (age, tumour size and comorbidity). In the video-assisted group, 2 patients were excluded due to conversion to an open thoracotomy. The number of mediastinal lymph nodes removed was as follows: VATS (right side) 24.0 lymph nodes/patient, open right-sided 25.2 lymph nodes/patient, VATS (left side) 25.1 lymph nodes/patient and open left-sided 21.1 lymph nodes/patient. With respect to the zones mentioned above, we found the following results: VATS vs open (mean number of lymph nodes/patient): Zone 1: 9 vs 8.5; Zone 2: 6.3 vs 5.6; Zone 3: 2.4 vs 3.2; Zone 4: 6.5 vs 6.9; Zone 5: 0 vs 0.5; Zone 6: 3.2 vs 3.7; Zone 7: 4.6 vs 3.2 and Zone 8: 10.5 vs 8.9. There were no statistically significant differences between the procedures, either with respect to the overall number of lymph nodes or with respect to the number of lymph nodes in each zone.
CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal lymph node dissection can be performed as effectively by the video-assisted approach as by the open thoracotomy approach. Furthermore, the video-assisted approach allows a better visualization of different lymph node zones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphadenectomy; Mediastinal staging; Systematic lymph node dissection; VATS lobectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23295451     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic left mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Takuya Nagashima
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

2.  Long-term outcomes of open and video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer are similar: a propensity-matched study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Murakawa; Junji Ichinose; Haruaki Hino; Kentaro Kitano; Chihiro Konoeda; Jun Nakajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Can lymph node evaluation be performed well by video-assisted thoracic surgery?

Authors:  Zhenrong Zhang; Hongxiang Feng; Xiaowei Wang; Chaoyang Liang; Deruo Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mingyon Mun; Masayuki Nakao; Yosuke Matsuura; Junji Ichinose; Ken Nakagawa; Sakae Okumura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 5.  Lymph node dissection after pulmonary resection for lung cancer: a mini review.

Authors:  Stylianos Korasidis; Cecilia Menna; Claudio Andreetti; Giulio Maurizi; Antonio D'Andrilli; Anna Maria Ciccone; Francesco Cassiano; Erino Angelo Rendina; Mohsen Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Advocate the implementation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy program for early stage lung cancer treatment: time to transfer from why to how.

Authors:  Hongbin Zhang; Jens Carsten Rueckert
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study.

Authors:  Keqiang Liu; Jing Zhao; Weiqiang Zhang; Jian Tan; Jingbo Ma; Yingxin Pei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resections in Germany-a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Martin Reichert; Andrea Birgitta Gohlke; Florian Augustin; Dietmar Öfner; Andreas Hecker; Winfried Padberg; Johannes Bodner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Lymph Node Dissection in Surgery for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Open vs. Video-Assisted vs. Robotic-Assisted Approaches.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Özkan Demirhan; Kemal Ayalp; Erkan Kaba; Elena Uyumaz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 10.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery node dissection for lung cancer treatment.

Authors:  Atsushi Watanabe; Masahiro Miyajima; Taijiro Mishina; Kodai Tsuruta; Yuki Takahashi; Ryunosuke Maki; Makoto Tada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.