BACKGROUND: Tumor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic factor and may have an impact on tumor progression and response to chemotherapy. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system is related to cell proliferation and tumor growth. However, there is limited available data regarding the clinical and prognostic significance of VEGF or IGF-1 in advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum VEGF and IGF-1 levels in advanced gastric cancer patients who were treated with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX). METHODS: The study population consisted of 100 advanced gastric cancer patients (median age 56 years). Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) over 10 min, followed by a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 22 h of continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) on days 1-2. Treatment was repeated in 2-week intervals. The levels of serum VEGF and IGF-1 were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the serum level of VEGF and Lauren's classification (p = 0.030) and previous operations (p = 0.010). IGF-1 was associated with the number of metastases (p = 0.012). The median level of serum VEGF was decreased after FOLFOX chemotherapy (p = 0.034). However, none of the measured serum markers were significantly correlated with response. In univariate analysis, overall survival (p < 0.001) was significantly shorter in patients with high serum levels of VEGF. Multivariate analysis revealed that VEGF was an independent factor for overall survival (HR 2.221; 95% CI 1.377-3.583, p = 0.001). Furthermore, IGF-1 had no significant influence on the clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: A high level of serum VEGF is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. This may help to identify the patients who are more sensitive to the FOLFOX regimen.
BACKGROUND:Tumorvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic factor and may have an impact on tumor progression and response to chemotherapy. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system is related to cell proliferation and tumor growth. However, there is limited available data regarding the clinical and prognostic significance of VEGF or IGF-1 in advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum VEGF and IGF-1 levels in advanced gastric cancerpatients who were treated with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX). METHODS: The study population consisted of 100 advanced gastric cancerpatients (median age 56 years). Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) over 10 min, followed by a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 22 h of continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) on days 1-2. Treatment was repeated in 2-week intervals. The levels of serum VEGF and IGF-1 were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the serum level of VEGF and Lauren's classification (p = 0.030) and previous operations (p = 0.010). IGF-1 was associated with the number of metastases (p = 0.012). The median level of serum VEGF was decreased after FOLFOX chemotherapy (p = 0.034). However, none of the measured serum markers were significantly correlated with response. In univariate analysis, overall survival (p < 0.001) was significantly shorter in patients with high serum levels of VEGF. Multivariate analysis revealed that VEGF was an independent factor for overall survival (HR 2.221; 95% CI 1.377-3.583, p = 0.001). Furthermore, IGF-1 had no significant influence on the clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: A high level of serum VEGF is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. This may help to identify the patients who are more sensitive to the FOLFOX regimen.
Authors: Natalia Marek-Trzonkowska; Anna Kwieczyńska; Magdalena Reiwer-Gostomska; Tomasz Koliński; Andrzej Molisz; Janusz Siebert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240