OBJECTIVE: To evaluate handwashing behaviour 5 years after a handwashing intervention in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: In 2003, we randomised neighbourhoods to control, handwashing promotion, or handwashing promotion and water treatment. Intervention households were given soap +/- water treatment product and weekly handwashing education for 9 months. In 2009, we re-enrolled 461 households from the three study groups: control (160), handwashing (141), and handwashing + water treatment (160) and assessed hygiene-related outcomes, accounting for clustering. RESULTS: Intervention households were 3.4 times more likely than controls to have soap at their handwashing stations during the study visit [293/301 (97%) vs. 45/159 (28%), P < 0.0001]. While nearly all households reported handwashing after toileting, intervention households more commonly reported handwashing before cooking [relative risk (RR) 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.4)] and before meals [RR 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3-2.1)]. Control households cited a mean of 3.87 occasions for washing hands; handwashing households, 4.74 occasions; and handwashing + water treatment households, 4.78 occasions (P < 0.0001). Households reported purchasing a mean of 0.65 (control), 0.91 (handwashing) and 1.1 (handwashing + water treatment) bars of soap/person/month (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Five years after receiving handwashing promotion, intervention households were more likely to have soap at the household handwashing station, know key times to wash hands and report purchasing more soap than controls, suggesting habituation of improved handwashing practices in this population. Intensive handwashing promotion may be an effective strategy for habituating hygiene behaviours and improving health.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate handwashing behaviour 5 years after a handwashing intervention in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: In 2003, we randomised neighbourhoods to control, handwashing promotion, or handwashing promotion and water treatment. Intervention households were given soap +/- water treatment product and weekly handwashing education for 9 months. In 2009, we re-enrolled 461 households from the three study groups: control (160), handwashing (141), and handwashing + water treatment (160) and assessed hygiene-related outcomes, accounting for clustering. RESULTS: Intervention households were 3.4 times more likely than controls to have soap at their handwashing stations during the study visit [293/301 (97%) vs. 45/159 (28%), P < 0.0001]. While nearly all households reported handwashing after toileting, intervention households more commonly reported handwashing before cooking [relative risk (RR) 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.4)] and before meals [RR 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3-2.1)]. Control households cited a mean of 3.87 occasions for washing hands; handwashing households, 4.74 occasions; and handwashing + water treatment households, 4.78 occasions (P < 0.0001). Households reported purchasing a mean of 0.65 (control), 0.91 (handwashing) and 1.1 (handwashing + water treatment) bars of soap/person/month (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Five years after receiving handwashing promotion, intervention households were more likely to have soap at the household handwashing station, know key times to wash hands and report purchasing more soap than controls, suggesting habituation of improved handwashing practices in this population. Intensive handwashing promotion may be an effective strategy for habituating hygiene behaviours and improving health.
Authors: M Whitby; C L Pessoa-Silva; M-L McLaws; B Allegranzi; H Sax; E Larson; W H Seto; L Donaldson; D Pittet Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Stephen P Luby; Mubina Agboatwalla; Anna Bowen; Eben Kenah; Yushuf Sharker; Robert M Hoekstra Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Robert Aunger; Yolande Coombes; Peninnah Mukiri Maina; Carol Nkatha Matiko; Adam Biran; Val Curtis Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Stephen P Luby; Amal K Halder; Carole Tronchet; Shamima Akhter; Abbas Bhuiya; Richard B Johnston Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Robert E Black; Simon Cousens; Hope L Johnson; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Diego G Bassani; Prabhat Jha; Harry Campbell; Christa Fischer Walker; Richard Cibulskis; Thomas Eisele; Li Liu; Colin Mathers Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Igal Nevo; Maureen Fitzpatrick; Ruth-Everett Thomas; Paul A Gluck; Joshua D Lenchus; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Birnbach Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Anna Bowen; Huilai Ma; Jianming Ou; Ward Billhimer; Timothy Long; Eric Mintz; Robert M Hoekstra; Stephen Luby Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Regina I Ejemot-Nwadiaro; John E Ehiri; Dachi Arikpo; Martin M Meremikwu; Julia A Critchley Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Jane Bell; Lauren Alexander; Jane Carson; Amanda Crossan; John McCaughan; Hazel Mills; Damian O'Neill; John E Moore; B Cherie Millar Journal: Breathe (Sheff) Date: 2020-06
Authors: Regina I Ejemot-Nwadiaro; John E Ehiri; Dachi Arikpo; Martin M Meremikwu; Julia A Critchley Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-03
Authors: Alessandra N Bazzano; Richard A Oberhelman; Kaitlin Storck Potts; Anastasia Gordon; Chivorn Var Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: James R Palmieri; Susan L Meacham; Jenna Warehime; Sarah A Stokes; Janie Ogle; Dezarae Leto; Maggie Bax; Anca M Dauer; Janie Milliron Lozovski Journal: Res Rep Trop Med Date: 2018-07-26
Authors: Fahmida Tofail; Lia Ch Fernald; Kishor K Das; Mahbubur Rahman; Tahmeed Ahmed; Kaniz K Jannat; Leanne Unicomb; Benjamin F Arnold; Sania Ashraf; Peter J Winch; Patricia Kariger; Christine P Stewart; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-04