Literature DB >> 23293982

Modeling approaches for characterizing and evaluating environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials in support of risk-based decision making.

Christine Ogilvie Hendren1, Michael Lowry, Khara D Grieger, Eric S Money, John M Johnston, Mark R Wiesner, Stephen M Beaulieu.   

Abstract

As the use of engineered nanomaterials becomes more prevalent, the likelihood of unintended exposure to these materials also increases. Given the current scarcity of experimental data regarding fate, transport, and bioavailability, determining potential environmental exposure to these materials requires an in depth analysis of modeling techniques that can be used in both the near- and long-term. Here, we provide a critical review of traditional and emerging exposure modeling approaches to highlight the challenges that scientists and decision-makers face when developing environmental exposure and risk assessments for nanomaterials. We find that accounting for nanospecific properties, overcoming data gaps, realizing model limitations, and handling uncertainty are key to developing informative and reliable environmental exposure and risk assessments for engineered nanomaterials. We find methods suited to recognizing and addressing significant uncertainty to be most appropriate for near-term environmental exposure modeling, given the current state of information and the current insufficiency of established deterministic models to address environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23293982     DOI: 10.1021/es302749u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

Review 1.  Engineered nanomaterial-induced lysosomal membrane permeabilization and anti-cathepsin agents.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Andrij Holian; Raymond F Hamilton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Stability and Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Groundwater and Surface Water.

Authors:  Jacob D Lanphere; Brandon Rogers; Corey Luth; Carl H Bolster; Sharon L Walker
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Exploring the effect of silver nanoparticle size and medium composition on uptake into pulmonary epithelial 16HBE14o-cells.

Authors:  Katja Kettler; Petra Krystek; Christina Giannakou; A Jan Hendriks; Wim H de Jong
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Uptake of silver nanoparticles by monocytic THP-1 cells depends on particle size and presence of serum proteins.

Authors:  Katja Kettler; Christina Giannakou; Wim H de Jong; A Jan Hendriks; Petra Krystek
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  A Tractable Method for Measuring Nanomaterial Risk Using Bayesian Networks.

Authors:  Finbarr Murphy; Barry Sheehan; Martin Mullins; Hans Bouwmeester; Hans J P Marvin; Yamine Bouzembrak; Anna L Costa; Rasel Das; Vicki Stone; Syed A M Tofail
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 7.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: model definition and evaluation.

Authors:  Johannes A J Meesters; Albert A Koelmans; Joris T K Quik; A Jan Hendriks; Dik van de Meent
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO2 , and Nano-ZnO) in European Freshwaters.

Authors:  Hyunjoo Hong; Véronique Adam; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.