| Literature DB >> 23293773 |
Richard Lu1, Vsevolod Popov, Jignesh Patel, Tonyia Eaves-Pyles.
Abstract
Alveolar type II pneumocytes (ATII) and alveolar macrophages (AM) play a crucial role in the lung's innate immune response. Burkholderia pseudomallei (BP) and Burkholderia mallei (BM) are facultative Gram-negative bacilli that cause melioidosis and glanders, respectively. The inhalation of these pathogens can cause lethal disease and death in humans. We sought to compare the pathogenesis of and host responses to BP and BM through contact with human primary ATII cells and monocytes-derived macrophages (MDM). We hypothesized that because BP and BM induce different disease outcomes, each pathogen would induce distinct, unique host immune responses from resident pulmonary cells. Our findings showed that BP adhered readily to ATII cells compared to BM. BP, but not BM, was rapidly internalized by macrophages where it replicated to high numbers. Further, BP-induced significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion from ATII cells (IL-6, IL-8) and macrophages (IL-6, TNFα) at 6 h post-infection compared to BM (p < 0.05). Interestingly, BM-induced the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, in ATII cells and macrophages at 6 h post-infection, with delayed induction of inflammatory cytokines at 24 h post-infection. Because BP is flagellated and produces LPS, we confirmed that it stimulated both Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR5 via NF-κb activation while the non-flagellated BM stimulated only TLR4. These data show the differences in BP and BM pathogenicity in the lung when infecting human ATII cells and macrophages and demonstrate the ability of these pathogens to elicit distinct immune responses from resident lung cells which may open new targets for therapeutic intervention to fight against these pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderia; Toll-like receptor; alveoli; cytokines; epithelial cells; innate immune response; macrophages
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23293773 PMCID: PMC3531596 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1ATII cells were grown on 3.0-um transwell filters to confluence prior to apical exposure of BM and BP at an MOI of approximately 100:1 for 4 h. Minimal contact of BM (A and B) with ATII cells was visualized via SEM. However, BP (C–E) adhesion to the apical surface of ATII cells was observed and the pathogen was entangled by the ATII microvilli [D (white boxed area) and E]. Further, quantitative analysis of attachment showed that BP significantly adhered better to ATII cells compared to BM (p < 0.05; F). Data is representative of triplicate samples of three experiments and is represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05.
Figure 2ATII cells and MDM were infected with BM or BP (MOI 100:1) for 6 or 20 h. Supernatant was collected and analyzed for cytokine secretion. Un-stimulated cells served as baseline controls. BP stimulated higher levels of IL-6 (A) and TNF-α (B) from MDM as well as IL-6 (D) and IL-8 (E) from ATII cells at 6 and 20 h post-infection compared to BM. However, BM-induced significantly higher IL-10 secretion from MDM compared to BP at 6 h post-infection (C). Additionally, IL-10 was significantly secreted from BM-ATII cells compared to BP at both 6 and 20 h post-infection (F). Data is representative of two experiments containing duplicate conditions/experiment and is represented as mean ± SEM. *denotes significance of p < 0.05.
Figure 3Phagocytosis and intracellular replication of MDM and ATII cells were infected with BM or BP (MOI of 100:1). As determined by CFUs, phagocytosis (accessed at 1 h) and intracellular replication (accessed at 3 h post-infection) of BP by MDM was significantly higher compared to BM (A). Alternatively, neither BM nor BP invaded or replicated to high numbers in ATII cells (B). Data is representative of two experiments containing duplicate conditions/experiment and is represented as mean ± SEM. *denotes significance of p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Figure 4To determine if BM and/or BP stimulated various TLRs, HEK293 cells expressing TLRs 4 and 5 and transfected with the firefly luciferase plasmid pNiFty2-Luc were stimulated with BM or BP at an MOI of 100:1. Un-stimulated cells served as negative controls. The TLR agonist served as positive controls. The cells were incubated with live bacteria for 6 h. The medium was then aspirated and replaced with fresh DMEM without antibiotics and incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. The TLR agonists remained with the cells for an overnight incubation. The following day, samples were analyzed to determine luciferase activity. Data is expressed as relative luciferase activity. Both BM and BP (B) stimulated TLR4 as effectively as the LPS agonist (A). However, the flagellin from BP stimulated TLR5 (B) as we detected flagellin in the medium of B-infected cells but not BM (C). Three experiments were performed in using triplicate samples and data is represented as mean ± SEM and *denotes significant differences of p < 0.01.