Literature DB >> 23292987

Allograft salvage procedure in multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Roberto Buda1, Alberto Ruffilli, Francesco Di Caprio, Alberto Ferruzzi, Cesare Faldini, Marco Cavallo, Francesca Vannini, Sandro Giannini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions represent a surgical challenge due to the presence of previous tunnels, hardware, injuries to the secondary stabilizers, and difficulties in retrieving autologous tendons. An anatomic ACL reconstruction may therefore result in a demanding surgery, thus requiring 2 stages.
PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy of an over-the-top ACL reconstruction technique plus extra-articular plasty using Achilles or tibialis posterior tendon allograft in restoring knee stability in patients with at least 2 failed previous ACL reconstructions, as well as to evaluate the factors able to affect the final outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2008, 24 male athletes with a mean age of 30.8 years underwent surgery. Twenty patients had undergone 2, whereas 4 patients had undergone 3 previous reconstructions. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and KT-2000 arthrometric evaluation were used to measure outcomes at a mean follow-up period of 3.3 years (range, 2-7).
RESULTS: The mean ± SD IKDC subjective score at follow-up was 81.3 ± 14.0. The IKDC objective score was an A or B in 20 patients (83%). Arthrometer side-to-side difference averaged 3.1 ± 1.1 mm. Range of motion was normal or nearly normal in 23 patients and abnormal in 1. Of the 20 good results, 17 patients resumed sports activity at the preinjury level.
CONCLUSION: A 2-stage revision is an accepted option in cases of excessive tunnel enlargement and bone loss, especially on the femoral side, to achieve anatomic reconstruction. Nonanatomic over-the-top ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular plasty technique allow one to overcome difficult anatomic situations on the femoral side, permitting a 1-step surgery. The overall results obtained in this series are comparable with those of other ACL revision series. The higher rate of mild instability observed in our series may not be attributable to the surgical technique but rather to the chronic instability suffered by these knees before last revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292987     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512471025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

Review 1.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Good mid-term outcomes and low rates of residual rotatory laxity, complications and failures after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Juan Pablo Zicaro; Matias Costa-Paz; Kristian Samuelsson; Adrian Wilson; Stefano Zaffagnini; Vincenzo Condello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica Zanovello; Federica Rosso; Alessandro Bistolfi; Roberto Rossi; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  Does Donor Age of Nonirradiated Achilles Tendon Allograft Influence Mid-Term Results of Revision ACL Reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Marco Nitri; Luca Macchiarola; Federico Stefanelli; Gianandrea Lucidi; Alberto Grassi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-02-12

5.  Return to play after three ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in an elite soccer player: A case report.

Authors:  José Carlos Noronha; João Pedro Oliveira; João Brito
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-19

6.  Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great.

Authors:  Ian D Engler; Matthew J Salzler; Andrew J Wall; William R Johnson; Amun Makani; Margaret V Shields; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-02

7.  Injuries to the anterolateral ligament are observed more frequently compared to lesions to the deep iliotibial tract (Kaplan fibers) in anterior cruciate ligamant deficient knees using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Armin Runer; Dietmar Dammerer; Christoph Kranewitter; Johannes M Giesinger; Benjamin Henninger; Michael T Hirschmann; Michael C Liebensteiner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Imaging Findings of Complications After Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis of the Knee: A Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Danielle C Marshall; Flavio D Silva; Brandon T Goldenberg; Daniel Quintero; Michael G Baraga; Jean Jose
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.