Literature DB >> 23292884

Comparison of dixon and T1-weighted MR methods to assess the degree of fat infiltration in duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.

Beatrijs H Wokke1, Clemens Bos, Monique Reijnierse, Carla S van Rijswijk, Holger Eggers, Andrew Webb, Jan J Verschuuren, Hermien E Kan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare different lipid multipeak spectral models to the single-peak model in Dixon-based fat-water separation and to evaluate differences between visually scored magnetic resonance (MR) images and quantitatively assessed fat fractions in muscle of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted and 3-point Dixon imaging of the upper and lower leg was performed in 13 Duchenne patients and six healthy controls. Three-, four-, and five-peak lipid spectrum models were compared to a single-peak model and to each other. T1-weighted images were visually scored by two radiologists and quantitative fat fractions were obtained from Dixon images.
RESULTS: Differences between the multipeak spectral models were minimal. The three-peak model was used for subsequent comparisons. Although there was high correlation between quantitative and visual scores, visual scores were consistently higher than quantitative values of the same muscles.
CONCLUSION: There are minor differences between the various lipid spectral models in terms of quantifying fat fraction in a large number of skeletal muscles in the legs of Duchenne patients and healthy controls. Quantitative 3-point Dixon MRI is more precise and reliable than visual radiological methods for evaluation of fat fractions for potential longitudinal follow-up or therapy evaluation of Duchenne patients.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duchenne muscular dystrophy; fatty infiltration; quantitative MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292884     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  50 in total

Review 1.  Advanced MRI Techniques for Muscle Imaging.

Authors:  Vivek Kalia; Doris G Leung; Darryl B Sneag; Filippo Del Grande; John A Carrino
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Quantitative proton MR techniques for measuring fat.

Authors:  H H Hu; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Sensitivity of chemical shift-encoded fat quantification to calibration of fat MR spectrum.

Authors:  Xiaoke Wang; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease.

Authors:  Bruce M Damon; Ke Li; Richard D Dortch; E Brian Welch; Jane H Park; Amanda K W Buck; Theodore F Towse; Mark D Does; Daniel F Gochberg; Nathan D Bryant
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Reliability of measuring the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and paraspinal muscles using MRI mDIXON-Quant sequence.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Zhuang Zhou; Chao Wang; Xiaoguang Cheng; Ling Wang; Yangyang Duanmu; Chenxin Zhang; Nicola Veronese; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of two-, three- and four-point Dixon techniques for clinical intramuscular fat quantification at 3 T.

Authors:  J J Noble; S F Keevil; J Totman; G D Charles-Edwards
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Assessment of intramuscular lipid and metabolites of the lower leg using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Donovan J Lott; Sean C Forbes; Sunita Mathur; Sean A Germain; Claudia R Senesac; H Lee Sweeney; Glenn A Walter; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.296

8.  Fat saturation in dynamic breast MRI at 3 Tesla: is the Dixon technique superior to spectral fat saturation? A visual grading characteristics study.

Authors:  P Clauser; K Pinker; T H Helbich; P Kapetas; M Bernathova; P A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Texture analysis using T1-weighted images for muscles in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease patients and volunteers.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Young Cheol Yoon; Hyun Su Kim; Jae-Hun Kim; Byung-Ok Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  MRI proton density fat fraction is robust across the biologically plausible range of triglyceride spectra in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Adrija Mamidipalli; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Dennis H Chen; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Michael S Middleton; Scott B Reeder; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.