Literature DB >> 23292674

Preliminary results of surgical and quality of life outcomes of Physiomesh in an international, prospective study.

Joel F Bradley1, Kristopher B Williams, Blair A Wormer, Victor B Tsirline, Amanda L Walters, Ronald F Sing, Igor Belyansky, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

Physiomesh is a novel, lightweight, large pore, polypropylene mesh designed to have flexibility that matches the compliance of the abdominal wall in an effort to improve patient quality of life (QOL). The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for ventral hernia repair (VHR) and inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with Physiomesh. Demographics, operative and postoperative details, and the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) as a measure of QOL were recorded. Physiomesh was used in 100 patients, 29 IHR and 71 VHR. Their average age was 56.8 +/- 13.7, and BMI was 34.0 +/- 21.0 kg/m2. For IHR, preoperative pain (CCS > or = 2) was present in 41%, but decreased at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to 25.9%, 0%, and 1.6%, while movement limitation decreased from 42.9% to 18.5%, 1.6%, and 3.1%. There were no complications or recurrences. The average VHR measured 66.4 cm2; 93% underwent a laparoscopic repair. Pain was present in 59.1% preoperatively but 21% at 12 months. Movement limitations reduced from 43.2% to 15.8% at 12 months. Mesh sensation was reported in only 10.5% at 1 year. There was 1 recurrence. Physiomesh is well tolerated by patients undergoing IHR and VHR. It is associated with a very favorable long-term QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23292674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  5 in total

1.  Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Steven A Groene; Tanu Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mesh shrinkage depends on mesh properties and anchoring device: an experimental long-term study in sheep.

Authors:  S Harsløf; N Zinther; T Harsløf; C Danielsen; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Tacks, staples, or suture: method of peritoneal closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair effects early quality of life.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Bindhu Oommen; Mimi Kim; Amanda L Walters; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  Kryspin Mitura; Marzena Skolimowska-Rzewuska; Karolina Garnysz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes.

Authors:  Ferdinand Köckerling; Thomas Simon; Martin Hukauf; Achim Hellinger; Rene Fortelny; Wolfgang Reinpold; Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.