Literature DB >> 23292523

Bronchodilator responsiveness using spirometry in healthy and asthmatic preschool children.

Luis Miguel Borrego1, Janet Stocks, Isabel Almeida, Sanja Stanojevic, João Antunes, Paula Leiria-Pinto, José E Rosado-Pinto, Ah-Fong Hoo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess repeatability and reproducibility of spirometry measurements, and bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), in healthy 3-6-year-old preschool children and those with asthma.
DESIGN: Spirometry was performed before and 20 minutes after administering either inhaled placebo (for repeatability) or 400 μg salbutamol (for BDR) on two separate occasions (reproducibility) 3-23 days apart in asthmatic preschoolers and healthy controls. SETTINGS: Lung Function Laboratory, Hospital de Dona Estefania, Lisbon. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy preschool children and those with physician-diagnosed asthma, recruited from local Health Clinics and Outpatient Clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Paired measurements of forced expired volume in 0.75 s (FEV(0.75)) and forced mid-expiratory flows (FEF(25-75)).
RESULTS: Technically successful baseline results were obtained in 86% of children assessed. Paired data were obtained in 43 asthmatic and 22 controls (median (range) age: 5.1 (3.4-6.8) years). Baseline FEV(0.75) was significantly lower in asthmatic children (mean (SD): 90 (15)% predicted) than in controls (102 (13) % predicted; p<0.001). Within-occasion coefficient of repeatability following placebo was similar in both groups, being 10.4% in asthma and 13.2% in controls for FEV(0.75). Following bronchodilator, FEV(0.75) increased significantly more in asthmatic preschoolers (mean (SD): 15.0 (12) %) than in controls (4.5 (5) %; p<0.001), with no significant difference between groups post-bronchodilator. Between-occasion variability was similar to within-day repeatability in controls, but almost twice as high in asthmatic children.
CONCLUSIONS: BDR can be assessed reliably using FEV(0.75) in wheezy preschoolers, provided within-subject variability and responsiveness in health are taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292523     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  5 in total

Review 1.  Tools in Asthma Evaluation and Management: When and How to Use Them?

Authors:  Anna Mulholland; Alana Ainsworth; Naveen Pillarisetti
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Birth data accessibility via primary care health records to classify health status in a multi-ethnic population of children: an observational study.

Authors:  Rachel Bonner; Vassiliki Bountziouka; Janet Stocks; Seeromanie Harding; Angela Wade; Chris Griffiths; David Sears; Helen Fothergill; Hannah Slevin; Sooky Lum
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.871

3.  Bronchodilator response cut-off points and FEV 0.75 reference values for spirometry in preschoolers.

Authors:  Edjane Figueiredo Burity; Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira; Marcus Herbert Jones; Larissa Bouwman Sayão; Armèle Dornelas de Andrade; Murilo Carlos Amorim de Britto
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Asthma medication in children who are overweight/obese: justified treatment?

Authors:  Yvette E Lentferink; Nienke E Boogaart; Walter A F Balemans; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Marja M J van der Vorst
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Assessment of Airway Bronchodilation by Spirometry Compared to Airway Obstruction in Young Children with Asthma.

Authors:  Daphna Vilozni; Fahed Hakim; Galit Livnat; Miryam Ofek; Ronen Bar-Yoseph; Lea Bentur
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.409

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.