Literature DB >> 23292342

Sickness certification of patients--a work environment problem among physicians?

T Ljungquist1, E Hinas, B Arrelöv, C Lindholm, A L Wilteus, G H Nilsson, K Alexanderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP). AIMS: To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.
METHODS: Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.
RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292342     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqs080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  7 in total

1.  Insurers' Influences on Attending Physicians of Workers Sick-listed for Common Mental Disorders: What Are the Impacts on Physicians' Practices?

Authors:  Chantal Sylvain; Marie-José Durand; Pascale Maillette
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

2.  General practitioners' perceptions of working with the certification of sickness absences following changes in the Swedish social security system: a qualitative focus-group study.

Authors:  Lars Carlsson; Linda Lännerström; Thorne Wallman; Inger K Holmström
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Possible causes of experiencing problems with sick leave questions in telephone nursing.

Authors:  Linda Lännerström; Inger K Holmström; Kurt Svärdsudd; Thorne Wallman
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 4.  Assessing work capacity - reviewing the what and how of physicians' clinical practice.

Authors:  P Nordling; G Priebe; C Björkelund; G Hensing
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Reasons for and factors associated with issuing sickness certificates for longer periods than necessary: results from a nationwide survey of physicians.

Authors:  Richard Bränström; Britt Arrelöv; Catharina Gustavsson; Linnea Kjeldgård; Therese Ljungquist; Gunnar H Nilsson; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Problems with sickness certification tasks: experiences from physicians in different clinical settings. A cross-sectional nationwide study in Sweden.

Authors:  Therese Ljungquist; Elin Hinas; Gunnar H Nilsson; Catharina Gustavsson; Britt Arrelöv; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Expectation of sickness absence duration: a review on statements and methods used in guidelines in Europe and North America.

Authors:  Wout E L de Boer; S Mohsen Mousavi; George L Delclos; Fernando G Benavides; Mercedes Lorente; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.367

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.