| Literature DB >> 23291935 |
Waldely Oliveira Dias1, Arno A J van der Ark, Maria Aparecida Sakauchi, Flávia Saldanha Kubrusly, Ana Fabíola R O Prestes, Monamaris Marques Borges, Noemi Furuyama, Denise S P Q Horton, Wagner Quintilio, Marta Antoniazi, Betsy Kuipers, Bernard A M van der Zeijst, Isaias Raw.
Abstract
An improved whole cell pertussis vaccine, designated as Plow, which is low in endotoxicity due to a chemical extraction of lipo-oligosaccharide (LOS) from the outer membrane, was evaluated for safety, immunogenicity and potency, comparatively to a traditional whole cell pertussis vaccine. Current whole cell pertussis vaccines are effective but contain large quantities of endotoxin and consequently display local and systemic adverse reactions after administration. Endotoxin is highly inflammatory and contributes considerably to the reactogenicity as well as the potency of these vaccines. In contrast, acellular pertussis vaccines hardly contain endotoxin and are significantly less reactogenic, but their elevated costs limit their global use, especially in developing countries. In this paper, bulk products of Plow and a traditional whole cell vaccine, formulated as plain monocomponents or combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTPlow or DTP, respectively) were compared by in vitro and in vivo assays. Chemical extraction of LOS resulted in a significant decrease in endotoxin content (20%) and a striking decline in endotoxin related toxicity (up to 97%), depending on the used in vitro or in vivo test. The LOS extraction did not affect the integrity of the product and, more importantly, did not affect the potency and/or stability of DTPlow. Moreover, hardly any differences in antibody and T-cell responses were observed. The development of Plow is a significant improvement regarding the endotoxicity of whole cell pertussis vaccines and therefore a promising and affordable alternative to currently available whole cell or acellular pertussis vaccines for developing countries.Entities:
Keywords: Bordetella pertussis; endotoxicity; immunogenicity; lypo-oligosaccharide; pertussis vaccines; reactogenicity; safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23291935 PMCID: PMC3859757 DOI: 10.4161/hv.22847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother ISSN: 2164-5515 Impact factor: 3.452
Table 1. Quantitative analysis of LOS content and activity of 15 batches of Plow and bulk products in the GC and LAL assay, respectively
| Plow | wP | p (t-Test) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.27 ± 0.88 | 6.57 ± 0.87 | ||
| 0.9/2.2/1.0 | 0.9/2.2/1.0 | | |
*t-Test assuming equal variances; **t-Test assuming unequal variances

Figure 1. Mouse weight gain at 16, 72 and 168 h after administration of Plow and wP was used as indicator for LOS-toxicity. Reference wP and aP, produced at the RIVM, were used as high and low toxic references to illustrate the upper and lower limits in toxicity.

Figure 2. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, 4h and 6h after primary immunization of mice with DTP or DTPlow (individual values of each animal; 10 animals per group). ***p ≤ 0.005.

Figure 3. Body temperature measured continuously with implanted temperature loggers in rabbits (n = 4), before and after two immunizations with Plow and wP. The white area is the difference in normal circadian body temperature before immunization and increased body temperatures after immunization.

Figure 4. Electron microscopy of negatively stained whole cell pertussis vaccines: (A) before solvent treatment (wP) and (B) after solvent treatment (Plow). The dimensions of the cells are indicated in micrometers.
Table 2. Potencies of Plow, wP, DTPlow and DTP bulk products estimated by means of the MPT
| (A) Potency of IB pertussis bulk products after production | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||||
| Potency (IU) | 9.6 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
| Potency (IU) | 5.6 | 7.3 | 4.5 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 5.5 | |
| Chi 2 test# | p = 0.896; proportion Plow/wP = 1.26 (0.56 - 2.84) | ||||||
| | |||||||
| assessed after production | Potency (IU) | 13.1 | 12.2 | 15.6 | 9.6 | | 12.2 |
| assessed after 3 y | Potency (IU) | 4.0 | 4.8 | 6.6 | 6.8 | | 5.7 |
| Chi 2 test# | p = 0.837; proportion NVI/IB = 0.46 (0.23−0.94) | ||||||
| | |||||||
| assessed after production | Potency (IU) | 11.7 | 21.3 | 12.3 | 10.6 | | 12.7 |
| assessed after 3 y | Potency (IU) | 8.8 | 6.4 | 11.9 | 14.7 | | 10.3 |
| Chi 2 test# | p = 0.665; proportion NVI/IB = 0.84 (0.40−1.74) | ||||||
# Chi-square test of homogenicity: potencies analyzed for similarity after log transformation and using the confidence intervals as weighing factor of the test reliability. Wgm, weighed geometric mean

Figure 5. IgG anti-pertussis toxin (PT), anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and anti-pertactin (69 K) antibodies (log titer) elicited in mice immunized with DTP or DTPlow vaccines. Significant p-values < 0.05 (Mann Whitney test).

Figure 6. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets (%) in spleen cells of mice immunized with DTP or DTPlow. The cells were in vitro stimulated with detoxified pertussis toxin (dPT). The control groups are composed of spleen cells obtained from mice injected with saline (Sal) and stimulated (S) or not stimulated (NS) with dPT.

Figure 7. Total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a anti-wP log antibody titers in mice immunized with DTP or DTPlow.