Literature DB >> 23291875

Blended learning: strengths, challenges, and lessons learned in an interprofessional training program.

G R Lotrecchiano1, P L McDonald, L Lyons, T Long, M Zajicek-Farber.   

Abstract

This field report outlines the goals of providing a blended learning model for an interdisciplinary training program for healthcare professionals who care for children with disabilities. The curriculum blended traditional face-to-face or on-site learning with integrated online interactive instruction. Credit earning and audited graduate level online coursework, community engagement experiences, and on-site training with maternal and child health community engagement opportunities were blended into a cohesive program. The training approach emphasized adult learning principles in different environmental contexts integrating multiple components of the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities Program. This paper describes the key principles adopted for this blended approach and the accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned. The discussion offers examples from training content, material gathered through yearly program evaluation, as well as university course evaluations. The lessons learned consider the process and the implications for the role of blended learning in this type of training program with suggestions for future development and adoption by other programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291875     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1175-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  8 in total

1.  Delphi Expert Parent Study: Factors Needed for 21st Century Pre- and Perinatal Parenting Programs.

Authors:  Christine L McKee; Peta Stapleton; Aileen M Pidgeon
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  A blended professional learning intervention for early childhood educators to target the promotion of physical activity and healthy eating: the HOPPEL cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial.

Authors:  Peden Me; Eady Mj; Okely Ad; Patterson K; Batterham M; Jones Ra
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  The experiences of lecturers in African, Asian and European universities in preparing and delivering blended health research methods courses: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Myroslava Protsiv; Salla Atkins
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Comparing student achievement in traditional learning with a combination of blended and flipped learning.

Authors:  Suhaila Halasa; Nimer Abusalim; Mohammad Rayyan; Rose E Constantino; Omayah Nassar; Huda Amre; Moayad Sharab; Insirah Qadri
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  Nursing and medical students near-peer activity in the anatomy laboratory: format for success.

Authors:  Patricia Alfaro; Sandie S Larouche; Nicole M Ventura; Jonathan Hudon; Geoffroy Pjc Noel
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-09-05

6.  Comparing the effectiveness of blended learning and traditional learning in an orthopedics course.

Authors:  Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit; Chirathit Anusitviwat; Pakjai Tuntarattanapong; Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-18

7.  Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning Programs for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pam Nicoll; Sandra MacRury; Hugo C van Woerden; Keith Smyth
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Nazim Uzzaman; Tracy Jackson; Aftab Uddin; Neneh Rowa-Dewar; Mohammod Jobayer Chisti; G M Monsur Habib; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.