Literature DB >> 23291164

Effectiveness of cochlear implants in children: long term results.

Maria Conceição Peixoto1, Jorge Spratley, Guiomar Oliveira, Jorge Martins, José Bastos, Carlos Ribeiro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, according to the hearing threshold and language performance, of cochlear implants through a period of 10 or more years of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted. 132 patients were selected from the children's population that underwent cochlear implantation at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, from 1992 to 2001, with a minimum follow-up period of 10 years. A comparison of the pure-tone and speech audiometric thresholds between two periods (T0 and T1) was performed. T0 refers to the initial evaluation, immediately after the rehabilitation programme, within the first year after cochlear implantation. T1 refers to the most recent annual assessment, carried out in 2010 and 2011. Speech understanding was also evaluated through word and sentence recognition tests.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between early and late assessments, in paediatric cochlear implants users, after a 10 years period of cochlear implantation. Both speech and pure-tone audiometry seem to stabilize except for 2000 Hz where the results were even better after 10 years. Factors such as age at time of implantation, duration of deafness, aetiology and exchange of the speech processor do not seem to have a role in auditory performance after a long rehabilitation period. In tests of verbal discrimination rates of words and phrases recognition were of 84.6% and 65.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implant is an effective treatment for severe to profound hearing loss in children, contributing to a hearing performance and an appropriate language acquisition, currently comparable to normal hearing children. These benefits appear to keep stable over the years. No deterioration was identified.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291164     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  10 in total

1.  Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children.

Authors:  Ozgul Akin Senkal; Evren Hizal; Haluk Yavuz; Ismail Yilmaz; Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Turn on the Music: Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Zachary W Bear; Anthony A Mikulec
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Ethics, equity, and human dignity in access to health services: the case of cochlear implants in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ivone Duarte; Cristina Costa Santos; Alberto Freitas; Guilhermina Rego; Rui Nunes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A Framework for Understanding the Relation Between Spoken Language Input and Outcomes for Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Derek M Houston
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  Evaluation of quality of life after paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jekaterina Byčkova; Justė Simonavičienė; Vaiva Mickevičienė; Eugenijus Lesinskas
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2018

6.  Diverse Linguistic Development in Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Pia De Stefano; Francesco Pisani; Giuseppe Cossu
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Auditory Sensory Gating in Children With Cochlear Implants: A P50-N100-P200 Study.

Authors:  Yan-Xin Chen; Xin-Ran Xu; Shuo Huang; Rui-Rui Guan; Xiao-Yan Hou; Jia-Qiang Sun; Jing-Wu Sun; Xiao-Tao Guo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Hearing Parents' Voices: Parental Refusal of Cochlear Implants and the Zone of Parental Discretion.

Authors:  Owen M Bradfield
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  [Evaluation of the results of cochlear implantation].

Authors:  Khaoula Hssaine; Btissam Belhoucha; Othman Benhommad; Youssef Rochdi; Hassan Nouri; Lahcen Aderdour; Abdelaziz Raji
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-10-08

10.  School failure in students who are normal-hearing or deaf: with or without cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ivone Duarte; Cristina Costa Santos; Guilhermina Rego; Rui Nunes
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.