OBJECTIVE: This paper examines how the monovalent varicella vaccine for children, with an adolescent catch-up dose, was introduced into Australia's National Immunisation Program (NIP), focusing on programme implementation. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants involved in programme implementation. Key themes from interviews were identified through content analysis. Childhood coverage was assessed using data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) with adolescent coverage obtained from state/territory immunisation programmes. Seroprevalence data were analysed from national serosurveys conducted before and after programme commencement. RESULTS: Implementation challenges for both parents and providers included: (a) parental report of previous infection as an exclusion criterion; (b) introducing a vaccine on its own at 18 months of age; and (c) adding the adolescent dose into existing school-based vaccination programmes with parental reported exclusion criteria. Despite these challenges, coverage rapidly reached 83% by 24 months of age and 30-33% for the adolescent catch-up dose. When considered in conjunction with estimated pre-vaccination natural immunity in both target groups (20% and 83%, respectively) coverage can be considered high. The serosurvey under-estimated coverage in 2-year-old children but was useful to assess trends in population immunity. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a single dose of monovalent varicella vaccine at 18 months of age and a school-based catch-up programme at 11-13 years of age successfully achieved high coverage, notwithstanding some challenges. Reported natural infection has been an exclusion criterion for vaccination, but as the programme matures and circulation of wild-type virus decreases, the need for this warrants consideration. There is a need for sensitive laboratory assays to measure vaccine-induced immunity at a population level.
OBJECTIVE: This paper examines how the monovalent varicella vaccine for children, with an adolescent catch-up dose, was introduced into Australia's National Immunisation Program (NIP), focusing on programme implementation. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants involved in programme implementation. Key themes from interviews were identified through content analysis. Childhood coverage was assessed using data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) with adolescent coverage obtained from state/territory immunisation programmes. Seroprevalence data were analysed from national serosurveys conducted before and after programme commencement. RESULTS: Implementation challenges for both parents and providers included: (a) parental report of previous infection as an exclusion criterion; (b) introducing a vaccine on its own at 18 months of age; and (c) adding the adolescent dose into existing school-based vaccination programmes with parental reported exclusion criteria. Despite these challenges, coverage rapidly reached 83% by 24 months of age and 30-33% for the adolescent catch-up dose. When considered in conjunction with estimated pre-vaccination natural immunity in both target groups (20% and 83%, respectively) coverage can be considered high. The serosurvey under-estimated coverage in 2-year-old children but was useful to assess trends in population immunity. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a single dose of monovalent varicella vaccine at 18 months of age and a school-based catch-up programme at 11-13 years of age successfully achieved high coverage, notwithstanding some challenges. Reported natural infection has been an exclusion criterion for vaccination, but as the programme matures and circulation of wild-type virus decreases, the need for this warrants consideration. There is a need for sensitive laboratory assays to measure vaccine-induced immunity at a population level.
Authors: Kristine Macartney; Heather F Gidding; Lieu Trinh; Han Wang; Aditi Dey; Brynley Hull; Karen Orr; Jocelynne McRae; Peter Richmond; Michael Gold; Nigel Crawford; Jennifer A Kynaston; Peter McIntyre; Nicholas Wood Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 16.193