Literature DB >> 23290669

The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography.

Richard E Sharpe1, David C Levin, Laurence Parker, Vijay M Rao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 2009 release of updated US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on screening mammography differed sharply from those of the American Cancer Society, the ACR, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The aim of this study was to ascertain the effect of these recommendations on the utilization of screening mammography in the Medicare population.
METHODS: The Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 2005 through 2010 were used to determine the annual utilization rate of screening mammography from 2005 to 2010. A utilization trend line was plotted for those years.
RESULTS: The utilization rate of screening mammography per 1,000 women in the Medicare population was 311.6 in 2005 and increased gradually each year to 322.9 in 2009 (a compound annual growth rate of 0.9%). However, after the USPSTF recommendations were issued in late 2009, this rate decreased abruptly to 309.1 (-4.3%) in 2010.
CONCLUSIONS: The abrupt decrease in the utilization of screening mammography in 2010 was in sharp contrast to the previous slow annual increases in its utilization from 2005 to 2009. Because there are no other factors to explain a decrease of this magnitude, it would seem that the USPSTF recommendations and the ensuing publicity resulted in a decrease in the utilization of screening mammography in the Medicare population in the first year after issuance of the new recommendations.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290669     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

1.  Response to Letter Regarding the Impact of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations in Breast Cancer Screening Trends.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Kelli S Hall; Allison L Roach; Edward D Rothman; Vanessa K Dalton; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Jennifer S Haas; Asaf Bitton; Charles Brackett; Julie Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Kimberly Harris; Steve Pyle; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Breast Cancer Incidence by Stage Before and After Change in Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Yong-Fang Kuo; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Trends in Breast Cancer Screening: Impact of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Kelli S Hall; Allison L Roach; Edward D Rothman; Vanessa K Dalton; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?

Authors:  Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

6.  Registry-based study of trends in breast cancer screening mammography before and after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Kenyon C Bolton; John L Mace; Sally D Herschorn; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Robert F Arao; Rebecca A Hubbard; Brian L Sprague; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Louise Henderson; Deidre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Anna N A Tosteson; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.

Authors:  David H Howard; Florence K L Tangka; Janet Royalty; Lucinda P Dalzell; Jacqueline Miller; Brett O'Hara; Kristy Joseph; Kristy Kenney; Gery Guy; Ingrid J Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Chiang-Hua Chang; Julie P W Bynum; Tracy Onega; Carrie H Colla; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  No evidence of excessive cancer screening in female noncarriers from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families.

Authors:  S Guedaoura; S Pelletier; W D Foulkes; P Hamet; J Simard; N Wong; Z El Haffaf; J Chiquette; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.