Literature DB >> 23290565

Evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging.

Bojan Strbac1, Vesna Spasic Jokic.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) set-up errors and propose optimum margins for planning target volume (PTV) coverage in head and neck radiotherapy.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. The total number of portal images studied was 632. Population systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors for the patients with head and neck cancer were evaluated based on the portal images in the caudocranial longitudinal (CC) and left-right lateral (LR) direction measured in the anterior-posterior (AP) field, as well as from the images in the caudocranial longitudinal (CC) and dorsoventral lateral (DV) direction measured in the lateral (LAT) field. The values for the clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins were calculated using ICRU Report 62 recommendations, along with Stroom's and van Herk's formulae.
RESULTS: The standard deviations of systematic set-up errors (Σ) ranged from 1.51 to 1.93 mm while the standard deviations of random set-up (σ) errors fell in between 1.77 and 1.86 mm. The mean 3D vector length of displacement was 2.66 mm. PTV margins calculated according to ICRU, Stroom's and van Herk's models were comprised between 1.95 and 6.16 mm in the three acquisition directions. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results we can conclude that a 6-mm extension of CTV to PTV margin, as the lower limit, is enough to ensure that 90% of the patients treated for head and neck cancer will receive a minimum cumulative CTV dose greater than or equal to 95% of the prescribed dose.
Copyright © 2012 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3DCRT; Head and neck; IMRT; PTV margins; Portal images; Radiotherapy; Set-up errors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290565     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  3 in total

1.  Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Authors:  A Boughalia; S Marcie; M Fellah; S Chami; F Mekki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to treat gastric cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka Skrobala; Marta Adamczyk; Aldona Karczewska-Dzionk
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-11-16

3.  Image guidance and positioning accuracy in clinical practice: influence of positioning errors and imaging dose on the real dose distribution for head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Katharina Bell; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe; Yvonne Dzierma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.