Literature DB >> 23289698

IRB decision-making with imperfect knowledge: a framework for evidence-based research ethics review.

Emily E Anderson1, James M DuBois.   

Abstract

Here we describe the five steps of evidence-based practice as applied to research ethics review and apply these steps to three exemplar dilemmas: incentive payments in substance abuse research; informed consent for biobanking; and placebo-controlled trials involving pregnant women in order to demonstrate the potential of empirical data to inform and improve IRB decision-making.
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2012        PMID： 23289698     DOI： 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00724.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN： 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  10 in total

1.  Rethinking risk assessment for emerging technology first-in-human trials.

Authors:  Anna Genske; Sabrina Engel-Glatter
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

2.  An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Evelyn Rhodes; Tyler Bourgoise; George M Carter; Robert S White; Debbie Indyk; Henry Sacks; Rosamond Rhodes
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker; Tiffany Lagare; Michelle Takemoto; Brittany Lewars; Katie Crist; Cinnamon S Bloss; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Reimagining IRB review to incorporate a clear and convincing standard of evidence.

Authors:  E Smith; E E Anderson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.057

6.  Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.

Authors:  Samantha Trace; Simon Erik Kolstoe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Applying Genetic and Genomic Tools to Psychiatric Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ana S IItis; Akaya Lewis; Sarah Neely; Stephannie Walker Seaton; Sarah H Jeong
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2021-11-30

8.  Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research.

Authors:  Kyle A McGregor; Mary A Ott
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  ELSI practices in genomic research in East Asia: implications for research collaboration and public participation.

Authors:  Go Yoshizawa; Calvin Wai-Loon Ho; Wei Zhu; Chingli Hu; Yoni Syukriani; Ilhak Lee; Hannah Kim; Daniel Fu Chang Tsai; Jusaku Minari; Kazuto Kato
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Jamie Brehaut; Charles Weijer; Spencer Phillips Hey; Cory E Goldstein; Merrick Zwarenstein; Ian D Graham; Joanne E McKenzie; Lauralyn McIntyre; Vipul Jairath; Marion K Campbell; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Dean A Fergusson; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.652
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.