Literature DB >> 23289678

An empirical examination of the current state of publically available nanotechnology guidance materials.

Laura Fleege1, Frances Lawrenz.   

Abstract

As part of "Nanodiagnostics and Nanotherapeutics: Building Research Ethics and Oversight," an empirical search was conducted to identify publicly available resources that guided understanding about human subjects issues in nanomedicine or nanotechnology including policy statements, guidance documents, or consent forms. The authors conducted 5,083 internet searches and analyzed 175 documents. Results show that very little guidance is publicly available and most documents focused on occupational and environmental concerns.
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23289678     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00704.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  1 in total

1.  Introduction: the challenge of nanomedicine human subjects research: protecting participants, workers, bystanders, and the environment.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.