| Literature DB >> 23289667 |
Hiroshi Sekiyama1, Tomohisa Nagoshi, Kimiaki Komukai, Masato Matsushima, Daisuke Katoh, Kazuo Ogawa, Kosuke Minai, Takayuki Ogawa, Michihiro Yoshimura.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although a decrease in serum potassium level has been suggested to be a fairly common observation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), there have so far been no definitive reports directly demonstrating the transient potassium decrease (the potassium dip) during ischemic attack of ACS compared to stable phase in individual patients. To understand the pathophysiological significance of the potassium dip, we examined the changes in serum potassium level throughout ischemic attack and evaluated the clinical factors affecting it.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23289667 PMCID: PMC3561250 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Baseline characteristics (n = 311)
| Age, years | 63 ± 12 |
| Male, gender (%) | 260 (83.6) |
| Height, cm | 167 ± 34.2 |
| Weight, kg | 66.4 ± 12.5 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.1 ± 3.9 |
| BP, mmHg | |
| Systolic | 137 ± 27 |
| Diastolic | 78 ± 17 |
| Mean | 98 ± 19 |
| K on admission, mmol/L | 4.1 ± 0.4 |
| K at discharge, mmol/L | 4.4 ± 0.4 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 | 71.1 ± 22.6 |
| Cr, mg/dL | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.0 ± 1.2 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 155 ± 68 |
| BNP, pg/mL | 144 ± 317 |
| LVEF, % | 54 ± 10.9 |
| Time of hospital stay, days | 12.3 ± 9.9 |
| Myocardial infarction (%) | 188 (60.5) |
| Unstable angina (%) | 123 (39.5) |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 122 (39.2) |
| Hypertension (%) | 212 (68.2) |
Figure 1The time course of the serum potassium concentration (K) profile. A. The average ± SD of K level in the total study patients (n = 311) on admission (during ischemic attack) and at discharge (during stable phase) (paired t-test, **P < 0.001). B. The K level in the 85 patients for whom the data before admission were available (**P < 0.001 and *P < 0.025 by one way repeated measure analysis of variance, followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparison correction for three phases). NS; not significant.
The results of a simple regression analysis of ΔK (n = 311)
| K on admission | −0.815 | 0.048 | −0.698 | 294.07 | <0.001 |
| Glucose on admission | 0.001 | 0.0004 | 0.126 | 5.026 | 0.026 |
| HbA1c | −0.020 | 0.024 | −0.048 | 0.7 | 0.404 |
| eGFR | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.063 | 1.213 | 0.272 |
| BNP | −0.0002 | 0.0001 | −0.101 | 3.181 | 0.075 |
| LVEF | −0.005 | 0.003 | −0.095 | 2.808 | 0.095 |
| BMI | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.075 | 1.726 | 0.19 |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.002 | −0.037 | 0.414 | 0.52 |
| Blood pressure (mean) | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 2.084 | 0.15 |
ΔK = K at discharge − K on admission.
K: potassium, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, BMI: body mass index, BP: blood pressure.
Figure 2The results of the simple regression analyses. The simple regression analyses between plasma glucose level on admission (during ischemic attack) and ΔK (A), between serum K level on admission (during ischemic attack) and ΔK (B) are shown. ΔK = K at discharge - K on admission.
Figure 3The comparison of ΔK among the changes in the medication profiles. The comparison of ΔK among indicated changes in the profiles of rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS-I) (A) and diuretics (B) in all patients (n = 311) are shown. The definitions of the indicated medication profiles were described in the Methods section. *P < 0.04 by one way analysis of variance, followed by Scheffe’s test for three subjects. NS; not significant.
Figure 4A comparison of ΔK among the medication profiles of β-blockers on admission. A comparison of ΔK among the medication profiles of β-blockers(−) indicating the subjects who did not take any β-blockers on admission (n = 262), those with β1 selective β-blockers use (n = 26) and those with non-selective β-blocker use (n = 23) on admission is shown. *P < 0.05 by one way analysis of variance, followed by Scheffe’s test for three subjects. NS; not significant.
The results of a multiple regression analysis of ΔK (n = 311)
| K on admission | −0.77 | 0.049 | −0.659 | <0.001 |
| Glucose on admission | 0.001 | 0.0005 | 0.177 | 0.005 |
| HbA1c | −0.054 | 0.026 | −0.127 | 0.04 |
| Use of β-blockers on admission (β1 selective) | 0.047 | 0.079 | 0.025 | 0.551 |
| (non-selective) | −0.161 | 0.084 | −0.8 | 0.058 |
| RAAS-I newly administered | 0.05 | 0.047 | 0.048 | 0.286 |
| Discontinued | 0.04 | 0.119 | 0.014 | 0.736 |
| Diuretics newly administered | 0.1 | 0.085 | 0.052 | 0.24 |
| Discontinued | 0.114 | 0.143 | 0.032 | 0.426 |
No significant variables (other than the medication profiles): BMI, Age, BP, eGFR, LVEF, BNP.
Dependent variable: ΔK.
Explanatory variables: BMI, Glucose, Age, BP, K on admission, HbA1c, eGFR, RASS-I or diuretics newly administered,
RAAS-I or diuretics discontinued, LVEF, BNP, use of β-blocker on admission.
K: potassium.
The impact of ΔK on disease severity and clinical course
| Time of hospital stay (days) | 10.5 ± 10.8 | 13.8 ± 8.9 | P = 0.0039 |
| Myocardial Infarction | 59 (43.4%) | 124 (70.9%) | P < 0.001 |
| Peak Creatine Kinase (U/L) | 1010.0 ± 1540.3 | 2004.1 ± 2329.0 | P < 0.001 |
The impact of K level on admission on disease severity and clinical course
| Time of hospital stay (days) | 11.6 ± 9.5 | 13.2 ± 10.3 | NS |
| Myocardial Infarction | 88 (52.1%) | 95 (66.9%) | P = 0.011 |
| Peak Creatine Kinase (U/L) | 1343.5 ± 1853.7 | 1838.3 ± 2296.3 | P = 0.04 |