Literature DB >> 23289565

Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes.

Christopher H Chandler1, Charles Ofria, Ian Dworkin.   

Abstract

Mate choice and sexual displays are widespread in nature, but their evolutionary benefits remain controversial. Theory predicts these traits can be favored by runaway sexual selection, in which preference and display reinforce one another due to genetic correlation; or by good genes benefits, in which mate choice is advantageous because extreme displays indicate a well-adapted genotype. However, these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, and the adaptive benefits underlying mate choice can themselves evolve. In particular, examining how and why sexual displays become indicators of good genes is challenging in natural systems. Here, we use experimental evolution in "digital organisms" to demonstrate the origins of condition-dependent indicator displays following their spread due to a runaway process. Surprisingly, handicap-like costs are not necessary for displays to become indicators of male viability. Instead, a pleiotropic genetic architecture underlies both displays and viability. Runaway sexual selection and good genes benefits should thus be viewed as interacting mechanisms that reinforce one another.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23289565     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Lutz Fromhage; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Population-Specific Covariation between Immune Function and Color of Nesting Male Threespine Stickleback.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Kum Chuan Shim; Matthew Schmerer; Chad D Brock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Context matters: sexual signaling loss in digital organisms.

Authors:  Emily G Weigel; Nicholas D Testa; Alex Peer; Sara C Garnett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  The evolutionary consequences of disrupted male mating signals: an agent-based modelling exploration of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the guppy.

Authors:  Alistair McNair Senior; Shinichi Nakagawa; Volker Grimm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A novel method for estimating the strength of positive mating preference by similarity in the wild.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Meirama; Daniel Estévez; Terence P T Ng; Gray A Williams; Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Anna Mammel; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Joseph T Kilmer; Allysa C Hallett; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Young male mating success is associated with sperm number but not with male sex pheromone titres.

Authors:  Tobias Kehl; Ian A N Dublon; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.