| Literature DB >> 23289015 |
Xiao-Qin Wu1, Wei-Min Yuan, Xiao-Jing Tian, Ben Fan, Xin Fang, Jian-Ren Ye, Xiao-Lei Ding.
Abstract
Pine wilt disease (PWD) caused by the pine wood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, is one of the most devastating diseases of Pinus spp. The PWN was therefore listed as one of the most dangerous forest pests in China meriting quarantine. Virulence of the PWN is closely linked with the spread of PWD. However, main factors responsible for the virulence of PWNs are still unclear. Recently epiphytic bacteria carried by PWNs have drawn much attention. But little is known about the relationship between endophytic bacteria and virulence of B. xylophilus. In this research, virulence of ten strains of B. xylophilus from different geographical areas in six provinces of China and four pine species were tested with 2-year-old seedlings of Pinus thunbergii. Endophytic bacteria were isolated from PWNs with different virulence to investigate the relationship between the bacteria and PWN virulence. Meanwhile, the carbon metabolism of endophytic bacteria from highly and low virulent B. xylophilus was analyzed using Biolog plates (ECO). The results indicated that ten strains of PWNs showed a wide range of virulence. Simultaneously, endophytic bacteria were isolated from 90% of the B. xylophilus strains. The dominant endophytic bacteria in the nematodes were identified as species of Stenotrophomonas, Achromobacter, Ewingella, Leifsonia, Rhizobium, and Pseudomonas using molecular and biochemical methods. Moreover, S. maltophilia, and A. xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans were the predominant strains. Most of the strains (80%) from P. massoniana contained either S. maltophilia, A. xylosoxidans, or both species. There was a difference between the abilities of the endophytic bacteria to utilize carbon sources. Endophytic bacteria from highly virulent B. xylophilus had a relatively high utilization rate of carbohydrate and carboxylic acids, while bacteria from low virulent B. xylophilus made better use of amino acids. In conclusion, endophytic bacteria widely exist in B. xylophilus from different pines and areas; and B. xylophilus strains with different virulence possessed various endophytic bacteria and diverse carbon metabolism which suggested that the endophytic bacteria species and carbon metabolism might be related with the B. xylophilus virulence.Entities:
Keywords: P. thunbergii.; Pinus massoniana; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus; endophytic bacteria; pine wilt disease; virulence
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23289015 PMCID: PMC3535532 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Origin of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus strains, sampling areas, and mortality of inoculated Pinus thurnbergii seedlings.
| Number | Nematode Strain | Pine host | Sampling area | Susceptible cases of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The first brown needles (d) | Mortality (%) / Symptom Grade* | ||||
| 1 | AMA3 | Maanshan, Anhui Province | 20 | 50 / III | |
| 2 | ZL1 | Linhai, Zhejiang Province | 26 | 40 / III | |
| 3 | HE2 | Enshi, Hubei Province | 33 | 40 / III | |
| 4 | GF3 | Fengkai, Guangdong Province | 23 | 40 / III | |
| 5 | ZZ1 | Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province | 22 | 30 / II | |
| 6 | AN19 | Guangde, Anhui Province | 22 | 30 / II | |
| 7 | JWB2 | Wuxi, Jiangsu Province | 26 | 20 / II | |
| 8 | AA3 | Anqing, Anwei Province | 45 | 20 / II | |
| 9 | JY20 | Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province | 29 | 10 / I | |
| 10 | YW4 | Dehong, Yunnan Province | 23 | 10 / I | |
| CK | -- | -- | -- | 0 / 0 | |
Mortality was determined 60 days after inoculation.
Fig 1Isolation of endophytic bacteria from surface-sterilized B. xylophilus. Surface-sterilized nematodes that were homogenized (B1-B10) or intact (A1-A10) were spread onto nutrient agar and incubated for 2 or 3 days. CK1 and CK2 were sterile water without or with grinding, respectively.
Nematodes isolated from infected pines and the abundance of endophytic bacteria.
| Nematode strain | number of nematodes | CFU* number per nematode |
|---|---|---|
| YW4 | 53 | 0 |
| GF3 | 110 | 0.05±0.01 |
| AA3 | 132 | 1.9±1.42 |
| WB2 | 109 | 2.42±1.41 |
| ZZ1 | 58 | 3.33±0.48 |
| AMA3 | 104 | 4.08±2.75 |
| ZL1 | 78 | 4.45±1.99 |
| HE2 | 163 | 5.19±1.71 |
| AN19 | 58 | 5.87±0.80 |
| JY20 | 80 | 19.3±2.93 |
Identifications of endophytic bacteria of B. xylophilus based on Biochemical characteristics and carbon substrate oxidation pattern (BIOLOG). An identification is considered a good match if the similarity index is ≥0.500 for BIOLOG analysis.
| Bacterial | Host nematode | Physical and Biochemical tests | Biolog Identification | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-stain reaction | Bacterial size (μm) | M.R. test | V.P. test | Indole test | Gelatin hydrolysis | Citrate utilization | H2S production | NH2 production | Nitrate reduction | PROB (%) | SIM | DIS | Speices | ||
| NSBx.2 | - | 0.28~0.4 × 0.5~1.2 | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.776 | 3.37 | ||
| NSBx.6 | - | 0.27~0.35 × 0.4~1.1 | - | - | + | _ | + | - | + | + | 97 | 0.620 | 5.53 | ||
| NSBx.9 | - | 0.28~0.4 × 0.5~1.2 | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.776 | 3.37 | ||
| NSBx.10 | - | 0.27~0.35 × 0.4~1.1 | - | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | 100 | 0.764 | 3.53 | ||
| NSBx.11 | - | 0.27~0.35 × 0.4~1.1 | - | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | 88 | 0.666 | 3.64 | ||
| NSBx.14 | - | 0.28~0.4 × 0.5~1.2 | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.530 | 7.44 | ||
| NSBx.16 | - | 0.34~0.6 × 0.25~0.37 | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | 100 | 0.868 | 1.97 | ||
| NSBx.18 | - | 0.34~0.6 × 0.25~0.37 | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | 100 | 0.781 | 3.29 | ||
| NSBx.19 | - | 0.27~0.35 × 0.4~1.1 | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | 93 | 0.730 | 3.23 | ||
| NSBx.22 | - | 0.27~0.35 × 0.4~1.1 | - | - | + | - | + | - | + | + | 100 | 0.828 | 2.56 | ||
| NSBx.23 | - | 0.28~0.4 × 0.5~1.2 | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.569 | 6.76 | ||
| NSBx.25 | - | 0.28~0.4 × 0.5~1.2 | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 97 | 0.629 | 5.00 | ||
| NSBx.27 | - | 0.8~0.36×0.33~0.23 | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.587 | 6.41 | ||
| NSBx.29 | + | 0.8~0.36 × 0.35~0.26 | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | 100 | 0.738 | 3.95 | ||
| NSBx.31 | - | 1.1~0.37 × 0.33~0.26 | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 100 | 0.570 | 4.32 | ||
Fig 2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees of endophytic bacteria isolated from B. xylophilus based on 16S rDNA. Support values lower than 50% are not indicated. The number at each branch point is the percentage supported by bootstrap. Genbank accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
Fig 3Virulence and endophytic bacterial species of different strains of B. xylophilus.
Fig 4AWCD of endophytic microbial community from B. xylophilus with different virulence.
Functional diversity of endophytic microbial community from B. xylophilus with different virulence.
| B. xylophilus | Diversity index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon-Wiener | Simpson | Evenness | |
| Highly virulent ZL1 | 1.646±0.103b | 0.763±0.030b | 0.705±0.040b |
| Low virulent AA3 | 2.769±0.151a | 0.930±0.008a | 0.978±0.044ab |
The values followed by different letters are significantly different according to t-test.
Fig 5Relative utilization ratios of six groups of carbon sources in Biolog Eco plate by the endophytic microbes from B. xylophilus.