Literature DB >> 23288843

Functional comparison of rod and cone Gα(t) on the regulation of light sensitivity.

Wen Mao1, K J Miyagishima, Yun Yao, Brian Soreghan, Alapakkam P Sampath, Jeannie Chen.   

Abstract

The signaling cascades mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exhibit a wide spectrum of spatial and temporal response properties to fulfill diverse physiological demands. However, the mechanisms that shape the signaling response of the GPCR are not well understood. In this study, we replaced cone transducin α (cTα) for rod transducin α (rTα) in rod photoreceptors of transgenic mice, which also express S opsin, to evaluate the role of Gα subtype on signal amplification from different GPCRs in the same cell; such analysis may explain functional differences between retinal rod and cone photoreceptors. We showed that ectopically expressed cTα 1) forms a heterotrimeric complex with rod Gβ(1)γ(1), 2) substitutes equally for rTα in generating photoresponses initiated by either rhodopsin or S-cone opsin, and 3) exhibited similar light-activated translocation as endogenous rTα in rods and endogenous cTα in cones. Thus, rTα and cTα appear functionally interchangeable. Interestingly, light sensitivity appeared to correlate with the concentration of cTα when expression is reduced below 35% of normal. However, quantification of endogenous cTα concentration in cones showed a higher level to rTα in rods. Thus, reduced sensitivity in cones cannot be explained by reduced coupling efficiency between the GPCR and G protein or a lower concentration of G protein in cones versus rods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288843      PMCID: PMC3581426          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.430058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  68 in total

Review 1.  Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  William M Oldham; Heidi E Hamm
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Transducin activation state controls its light-dependent translocation in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Vasily Kerov; Desheng Chen; Mustapha Moussaif; Yu-Jiun Chen; Ching-Kang Chen; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein.

Authors:  D G Lambright; J Sondek; A Bohm; N P Skiba; H E Hamm; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  L D Carter-Dawson; M M LaVail
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Characterization of transducin from bovine retinal rod outer segments. Participation of the amino-terminal region of T alpha in subunit interaction.

Authors:  S E Navon; B K Fung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The cone-specific visual cycle.

Authors:  Jin-Shan Wang; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Replacing the rod with the cone transducin subunit decreases sensitivity and accelerates response decay.

Authors:  C-K Chen; M L Woodruff; F S Chen; H Shim; M C Cilluffo; G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The rod transducin alpha subunit amino terminus is heterogeneously fatty acylated.

Authors:  T A Neubert; R S Johnson; J B Hurley; K A Walsh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  N-terminal fatty acylation of transducin profoundly influences its localization and the kinetics of photoresponse in rods.

Authors:  Vasily Kerov; William W Rubin; Michael Natochin; Nathan A Melling; Marie E Burns; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Role for the target enzyme in deactivation of photoreceptor G protein in vivo.

Authors:  S H Tsang; M E Burns; P D Calvert; P Gouras; D A Baylor; S P Goff; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Molecular evolutionary analysis of vertebrate transducins: a role for amino acid variation in photoreceptor deactivation.

Authors:  Yi G Lin; Cameron J Weadick; Francesco Santini; Belinda S W Chang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Effect of Rhodopsin Phosphorylation on Dark Adaptation in Mouse Rods.

Authors:  Justin Berry; Rikard Frederiksen; Yun Yao; Soile Nymark; Jeannie Chen; Carter Cornwall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Regulation of calcium homeostasis in the outer segments of rod and cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Frans Vinberg; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Autophagy supports survival and phototransduction protein levels in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Z Zhou; T A Doggett; A Sene; R S Apte; T A Ferguson
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 15.828

6.  The N termini of the inhibitory γ-subunits of phosphodiesterase-6 (PDE6) from rod and cone photoreceptors differentially regulate transducin-mediated PDE6 activation.

Authors:  Xin Wang; David C Plachetzki; Rick H Cote
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The evolution of rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Ala Morshedian; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Induction of the unfolded protein response by constitutive G-protein signaling in rod photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  Tian Wang; Jeannie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Why are rods more sensitive than cones?

Authors:  Norianne T Ingram; Alapakkam P Sampath; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Rod visual pigment optimizes active state to achieve efficient G protein activation as compared with cone visual pigments.

Authors:  Keiichi Kojima; Yasushi Imamoto; Ryo Maeda; Takahiro Yamashita; Yoshinori Shichida
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.