Literature DB >> 23288621

Quality-of-care initiative in patients treated surgically for perforated peptic ulcer.

M H Møller1, H J Larsson, S Rosenstock, H Jørgensen, S P Johnsen, A H Madsen, S Adamsen, A G Jensen, E Zimmermann-Nielsen, R W Thomsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality and morbidity are considerable after treatment for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Since 2003, a Danish nationwide quality-of-care (QOC) improvement initiative has focused on reducing preoperative delay, and improving perioperative monitoring and care for patients with PPU. The present study reports the results of this initiative.
METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected data, involving all hospitals caring for patients with PPU in Denmark. Details of patients treated surgically for PPU between September 2004 and August 2011 were reported to the Danish Clinical Register of Emergency Surgery. Changes in baseline patient characteristics and in seven QOC indicators are presented, including relative risks (RRs) for achievement of the indicators.
RESULTS: The study included 2989 patients. An increasing number fulfilled the following four QOC indicators in 2010-2011 compared with the first 2 years of monitoring: preoperative delay no more than 6 h (59·0 versus 54·0 per cent; P = 0·030), daily monitoring of bodyweight (48·0 versus 29·0 per cent; P < 0·001), daily monitoring of fluid balance (79·0 versus 74·0 per cent; P = 0·010) and daily monitoring of vital signs (80·0 versus 68·0 per cent; P < 0·001). A lower proportion of patients had discontinuation of routine prophylactic antibiotics (82·0 versus 90·0 per cent; P < 0·001). Adjusted 30-day mortality decreased non-significantly from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 (adjusted RR 0·87, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·76 to 1·00), whereas the rate of reoperative surgery remained unchanged (adjusted RR 0·98, 0·78 to 1·23).
CONCLUSION: This nationwide quality improvement initiative was associated with reduced preoperative delay and improved perioperative monitoring in patients with PPU. A non-significant improvement was seen in 30-day mortality.
Copyright © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288621     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Perforations of the esophagus and stomach: what should I do?

Authors:  Francesca Dimou; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Emergency surgery in the elderly: the balance between function, frailty, fatality and futility.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kari F Desserud
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Emergency surgery over 111 years: are we still at a crossroads or ready for emergency surgery 2.0?

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Successful Endoscopic Management of Non-Healing Perforated Duodenal Ulcer with Polyglycolic Acid Sheet and Fibrin Glue.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Mishiro; Kotaro Shibagaki; Kayo Matsuda; Chika Fukuyama; Mayumi Okada; Hironobu Mikami; Daisuke Izumi; Noritsugu Yamashita; Eiko Okimoto; Naoki Fukuda; Masahito Aimi; Nobuhiko Fukuba; Naoki Oshima; Toshihiro Takanashi; Takeshi Matsubara; Norihisa Ishimura; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2016-12-21

9.  Delay to surgery in acute perforated and ischaemic gastrointestinal pathology: a systematic review.

Authors:  V Murray; J R Burke; M Hughes; C Schofield; A Young
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-07-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.