OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a draft occupational health guideline, aimed at preventing weight gain, on employees' body weight-related outcomes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, and quality of life. METHODS: In a cluster randomized controlled trial including 16 occupational physicians (OP) and 523 employees, guideline-based care was compared to usual care by OP between 2009-2011 in the Netherlands. Guideline-based care consisted of (i) providing advice to employers on how to assess and intervene on the obesogenic work environment, (ii) conducting five face-to-face behavioral change counseling sessions with employees to improve their lifestyles, and (iii) evaluating the outcome and maintaining sections i and ii. Data were collected at baseline and 6, 12, and 18-months follow-up. To evaluate the effects of the intervention, multilevel analyses were performed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the intervention and control group on waist circumference [β 1.2 cm, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.6-2.9], body weight (β 0.3 kg, 95% CI -1.0-1.6), body mass index (β 0.1 kg/m (2), 95% CI -0.3-0.5), systolic blood pressure (β 1.7 mmHG, 95% CI -2.4-5.8), diastolic blood pressure (β 0.3 mmHG, 95% CI -1.0-0.6), cholesterol (β 0 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.2-0.2), or quality of life indicators after 18-months follow-up. Stratified analyses showed an increase in waist circumference among men (β 2.5 cm, 95% CI 0.5-4.5) and obese intervention participants (β 2.7 cm, 95% CI 0.6-4.7) compared to control participants. CONCLUSION: The draft occupational health guideline was not more effective than usual care. Therefore, the guideline in its current form cannot be recommended for implementation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a draft occupational health guideline, aimed at preventing weight gain, on employees' body weight-related outcomes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, and quality of life. METHODS: In a cluster randomized controlled trial including 16 occupational physicians (OP) and 523 employees, guideline-based care was compared to usual care by OP between 2009-2011 in the Netherlands. Guideline-based care consisted of (i) providing advice to employers on how to assess and intervene on the obesogenic work environment, (ii) conducting five face-to-face behavioral change counseling sessions with employees to improve their lifestyles, and (iii) evaluating the outcome and maintaining sections i and ii. Data were collected at baseline and 6, 12, and 18-months follow-up. To evaluate the effects of the intervention, multilevel analyses were performed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the intervention and control group on waist circumference [β 1.2 cm, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.6-2.9], body weight (β 0.3 kg, 95% CI -1.0-1.6), body mass index (β 0.1 kg/m (2), 95% CI -0.3-0.5), systolic blood pressure (β 1.7 mmHG, 95% CI -2.4-5.8), diastolic blood pressure (β 0.3 mmHG, 95% CI -1.0-0.6), cholesterol (β 0 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.2-0.2), or quality of life indicators after 18-months follow-up. Stratified analyses showed an increase in waist circumference among men (β 2.5 cm, 95% CI 0.5-4.5) and obese intervention participants (β 2.7 cm, 95% CI 0.6-4.7) compared to control participants. CONCLUSION: The draft occupational health guideline was not more effective than usual care. Therefore, the guideline in its current form cannot be recommended for implementation.
Authors: Luke Wolfenden; Sharni Goldman; Fiona G Stacey; Alice Grady; Melanie Kingsland; Christopher M Williams; John Wiggers; Andrew Milat; Chris Rissel; Adrian Bauman; Margaret M Farrell; France Légaré; Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Rebecca K Hodder; Jannah Jones; Debbie Booth; Benjamin Parmenter; Tim Regan; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-11-14
Authors: Pieter Coenen; Suzan J W Robroek; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Karen M Oude Hengel Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Rebecca A Jeffery; Matthew J To; Gabrielle Hayduk-Costa; Adam Cameron; Cameron Taylor; Colin Van Zoost; Jill A Hayden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Suzan J W Robroek; Karen M Oude Hengel; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Pieter Coenen Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 9.213