Literature DB >> 23288175

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: a selection change?

Diego Felipe Gaia1, Aline Couto, João Roberto Breda, Carolina Baeta Neves Duarte Ferreira, Murilo Teixeira Macedo, Marcus Vinicius Gimenes, Enio Buffolo, José Honório Palma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement for bioprosthesis dysfunction is a procedure involving considerable risk. In some cases, mortality is high and may contraindicate the procedure. Minimally invasive transcatheter aortic "valve-in-valve" implant appears to be an alternative, reducing morbidity and mortality. The objective is to evaluate aortic valve-in-valve procedure using Braile Inovare prosthesis.
METHODS: The Braile Inovare prosthesis, transcatheter, expandable balloon, was used in 14 cases. Average EuroSCORE was 42.9%. All patients had double aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction. Procedures were performed in a surgical hybrid environment under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Using left minithoracotomy prostheses were implanted through the ventricular apex under high-frequency ventricular pacing. Serial clinical and echocardiographic controls were performed. Follow-up ranged 1-30 months.
RESULTS: Correct prosthetic deployment was obtained in all cases. There was no conversion. There was no operative mortality. The 30-day mortality was 14.3% (two cases). Ejection fraction increased significantly after the 7th postoperative day. Aortic gradient significantly reduced. The residual aortic regurgitation was not present. There were no vascular complications or complete atrioventricular block.
CONCLUSION: The transcatheter "valve-in-valve" procedure for bioprosthesis dysfunction is safe with low morbidity. This possibility may change prosthesis choice during the first aortic valve replacement, favoring bioprostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23288175     DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20120062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dong-Fang Zhao; Nelson Wang; Ya Ruth Huo; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A New Experimental Device for Transapical Access of the Aortic and Mitral Valves as well as the Aorta in its Various Segments.

Authors:  Leonardo Paim; José Honório Palma da Fonseca; Francismar Vidal de Arruda; Paulo Sampaio Gutierrez; Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 May-Jun

3.  Previous Cardiac Surgery: a Predictor of Mortality in Aortic Valve Replacement?

Authors:  Victor Dayan; Maria José Arocena; Amparo Fernandez; Eloísa Silva; Diego Pérez Zerpa
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

4.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Experience of One Brazilian Health Care Center.

Authors:  Fabiula Schwartz Azevedo; Marcelo Goulart Correa; Débora Holanda Gonçalves Paula; Alex Dos Santos Felix; Luciano Herman Juaçaba Belém; Ana Paula Chedid Mendes; Valeria Gonçalves Silva; Bruno Miranda Marques; Andrey José de Oliveira Monteiro; Clara Weksler; Alexandre Siciliano Colafranceschi; Daniel Arthur Barata Kasal
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

5.  Thrombocytopenia After Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation: Prognostic Marker or Mere Finding?

Authors:  Renato C de Souza; Leonardo Paim; Guilherme Viotto; Joaquim Aprigio; Lucas L Araújo; Henrique Ribeiro; Roney O Sampaio; Flavio Tarasoutchi; Pablo M A Pomerantzeff; José Honório Palma; Fabio B Jatene
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

6.  Mitral Valve-In-Valve: Defining the Indication Limits by in vitro Hydrodynamic Tests in a Brazilian Transcatheter Prosthesis.

Authors:  Thiago Vila Nova; Caio Cardoso; Ademir Braz; Honório Palma; Diego Gaia
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.