OBJECTIVE: To assess the role claudin-5, an endothelial cell (EC) tight junction protein, plays in establishing basal permeability levels in humans by comparing claudin-5 expression levels in situ and analyzing junctional organization and function in 2 widely used models of cultured ECs, namely human dermal microvascular (HDM)ECs and human umbilical vein (HUV)ECs. METHODS AND RESULTS: By immunofluorescence microscopy, ECs more highly express claudin-5 (but equivalently express vascular endothelial-cadherin) in human dermal capillaries versus postcapillary venules and in umbilical and coronary arteries versus veins, correlating with known segmental differences in tight junction frequencies and permeability barriers. Postconfluent cultured HDMECs express more claudin-5 (but equivalent vascular endothelial-cadherin) and show higher transendothelial electric resistance and lower macromolecular flux than similarly cultured HUVECs. HDMEC junctions are more complex by transmission electron microscopy and show more continuous claudin-5 immunofluorescence than HUVEC junctions. Calcium chelation or dominant negative vascular endothelial-cadherin overexpression decreases transendothelial electric resistance and disrupts junctions in HUVECs, but not in HDMECs. Claudin-5 overexpression in HUVECs fails to increase transendothelial electric resistance or claudin-5 continuity, whereas claudin-5 knockdown in HDMECs, but not in HUVECs, reduces transendothelial electric resistance and increases antibody accessibility to junctional proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Claudin-5 expression and junctional organization control HDMEC and arteriolar-capillary paracellular barriers, whereas HUVEC and venular junctions use vascular endothelial-cadherin.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role claudin-5, an endothelial cell (EC) tight junction protein, plays in establishing basal permeability levels in humans by comparing claudin-5 expression levels in situ and analyzing junctional organization and function in 2 widely used models of cultured ECs, namely human dermal microvascular (HDM)ECs and human umbilical vein (HUV)ECs. METHODS AND RESULTS: By immunofluorescence microscopy, ECs more highly express claudin-5 (but equivalently express vascular endothelial-cadherin) in human dermal capillaries versus postcapillary venules and in umbilical and coronary arteries versus veins, correlating with known segmental differences in tight junction frequencies and permeability barriers. Postconfluent cultured HDMECs express more claudin-5 (but equivalent vascular endothelial-cadherin) and show higher transendothelial electric resistance and lower macromolecular flux than similarly cultured HUVECs. HDMEC junctions are more complex by transmission electron microscopy and show more continuous claudin-5 immunofluorescence than HUVEC junctions. Calcium chelation or dominant negative vascular endothelial-cadherin overexpression decreases transendothelial electric resistance and disrupts junctions in HUVECs, but not in HDMECs. Claudin-5 overexpression in HUVECs fails to increase transendothelial electric resistance or claudin-5 continuity, whereas claudin-5 knockdown in HDMECs, but not in HUVECs, reduces transendothelial electric resistance and increases antibody accessibility to junctional proteins. CONCLUSIONS:Claudin-5 expression and junctional organization control HDMEC and arteriolar-capillary paracellular barriers, whereas HUVEC and venular junctions use vascular endothelial-cadherin.
Authors: E W Ades; F J Candal; R A Swerlick; V G George; S Summers; D C Bosse; T J Lawley Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Ruud D Fontijn; Jakub Rohlena; Jan van Marle; Hans Pannekoek; Anton J G Horrevoets Journal: Eur J Cell Biol Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Lei Yuan; Alexandra Le Bras; Anastasia Sacharidou; Kiyoshi Itagaki; Yumei Zhan; Maiko Kondo; Christopher V Carman; George E Davis; William C Aird; Peter Oettgen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Richard W Pierce; Riad Abou Zahr; Sarah Kandil; E Vincent S Faustino; Jordan S Pober Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Christine M Gross; Saurabh Aggarwal; Sanjiv Kumar; Jing Tian; Anita Kasa; Natalia Bogatcheva; Sanjeev A Datar; Alexander D Verin; Jeffrey R Fineman; Stephen M Black Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Alexander J Engler; Micha Sam B Raredon; Andrew V Le; Yifan Yuan; Yan A Oczkowicz; Ellen L Kan; Pavlina Baevova; Laura E Niklason Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2019-06-30 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Richard W Pierce; Veronika Shabanova; Michael Canarie; Mathew Pinto; Yong Sing da Silva; Vineet Bhandari; John S Giuliano Journal: Shock Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Giovanni Ligresti; Ryan J Nagao; Jun Xue; Yoon Jung Choi; Jin Xu; Shuyu Ren; Takahide Aburatani; Susan K Anderson; James W MacDonald; Theo K Bammler; Stephen M Schwartz; Kimberly A Muczynski; Jeremy S Duffield; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Ying Zheng Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Filip Roudnicky; Jitao David Zhang; Bo Kyoung Kim; Nikhil J Pandya; Yanjun Lan; Lisa Sach-Peltason; Heloise Ragelle; Pamela Strassburger; Sabine Gruener; Mirjana Lazendic; Sabine Uhles; Franco Revelant; Oliv Eidam; Gregor Sturm; Verena Kueppers; Klaus Christensen; Leonard D Goldstein; Manuel Tzouros; Balazs Banfai; Zora Modrusan; Martin Graf; Christoph Patsch; Mark Burcin; Claas A Meyer; Peter D Westenskow; Chad A Cowan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Norikiyo Ueno; Katherine S Harker; Elizabeth V Clarke; Frances Y McWhorter; Wendy F Liu; Andrea J Tenner; Melissa B Lodoen Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 3.715