Literature DB >> 23287833

The accuracy of simulated indoor time trials utilizing a CompuTrainer and GPS data.

Willard W Peveler1.   

Abstract

The CompuTrainer is commonly used to measure cycling time trial performance in a laboratory setting. Previous research has demonstrated that the CompuTrainer tends toward underestimating power at higher workloads but provides reliable measures. The extent to which the CompuTrainer is capable of simulating outdoor time trials in a laboratory setting has yet to be examined. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of replicating an outdoor time trial course indoors by comparing completion times between the actual time trial course and the replicated outdoor time trial course on the CompuTrainer. A global positioning system was used to collect data points along a local outdoor time trial course. Data were then downloaded and converted into a time trial course for the CompuTrainer. Eleven recreational to highly trained cyclists participated in this study. To participate in this study, subjects had to have completed a minimum of 2 of the local Cleves time trial races. Subjects completed 2 simulated indoor time trials on the CompuTrainer. Mean finishing times for the mean indoor performance trial (34.58 ± 8.63 minutes) were significantly slower in relation to the mean outdoor performance time (26.24 ± 3.23 minutes). Cyclists' finish times increased (performance decreased) by 24% on the indoor time trials in relation to the mean outdoor times. There were no significant differences between CompuTrainer trial 1 (34.77 ± 8.54 minutes) and CompuTrainer trial 1 (34.37 ± 8.76 minutes). Because of the significant differences in times between the indoor and outdoor time trials, meaningful comparisons of performance times cannot be made between the two. However, there were no significant differences found between the 2 CompuTrainer trials, and therefore the CompuTrainer can still be recommended for laboratory testing between trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23287833     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280ce76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Cerebral Regulation in Different Maximal Aerobic Exercise Modes.

Authors:  Flávio O Pires; Carlos A S Dos Anjos; Roberto J M Covolan; Fabiano A Pinheiro; Alan St Clair Gibson; Timothy D Noakes; Fernando H Magalhães; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Comparison of Ventilatory Measures and 20 km Time Trial Performance.

Authors:  Willard W Peveler; Brandy Shew; Samantha Johnson; Gabe Sanders; Roger Kollock
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Caffeine and Placebo Improved Maximal Exercise Performance Despite Unchanged Motor Cortex Activation and Greater Prefrontal Cortex Deoxygenation.

Authors:  Flavio O Pires; Carlos A S Dos Anjos; Roberto J M Covolan; Eduardo B Fontes; Timothy D Noakes; Alan St Clair Gibson; Fernando H Magalhães; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Caffeine increases motor output entropy and performance in 4 km cycling time trial.

Authors:  Bruno Ferreira Viana; Gabriel S Trajano; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.