BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The high prevalence of atrial fibrillation in aging populations leads to an increasing incidence of vitamin K antagonists-associated intracerebral hemorrhages (VKAs-ICH). It remains unclear whether VKAs are causes or risk factors for ICH. We aimed at identifying the specificities of VKAs-ICH. METHODS: We compared baseline characteristics of 545 consecutive patients receiving or not receiving VKAs before admission for spontaneous ICH. To determine whether the influence of VKAs depends on the underlying vasculopathy, that is, cerebral amyloid angiopathy in lobar, and deep perforating arteries vasculopathy in deep ICH, we compared characteristics of ICH (including volume) according to the anatomic distribution of ICH in multiple linear regression. RESULTS: VKAs-ICH accounted for 83 patients, that is, 15% (95% confidence intervals, 12-18) of ICH in our cohort. The use of VKAs did not influence anatomic distribution of ICH. The impact of VKAs on ICH volume differed according to ICH location: in nonlobar ICH, VKAs use was associated with significant larger ICH volumes (median volume 25 mL vs 12 mL; P=0.002). In lobar ICH, VKAs use did not influence the volume (median 26 mL vs 30 mL; P=0.507). CONCLUSIONS: A similar anatomic distribution of ICH in patients with or without VKAs suggests that VKAs should not be considered as a cause of ICH because both locations are usually due to different vasculopathies (deep perforating arteries vasculopathy in deep and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in lobar). The different impact of VKAs on ICH volumes according to location suggests a different susceptibility of these vasculopathies to VKAs. This finding may lead to specific therapeutic strategies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The high prevalence of atrial fibrillation in aging populations leads to an increasing incidence of vitamin K antagonists-associated intracerebral hemorrhages (VKAs-ICH). It remains unclear whether VKAs are causes or risk factors for ICH. We aimed at identifying the specificities of VKAs-ICH. METHODS: We compared baseline characteristics of 545 consecutive patients receiving or not receiving VKAs before admission for spontaneous ICH. To determine whether the influence of VKAs depends on the underlying vasculopathy, that is, cerebral amyloid angiopathy in lobar, and deep perforating arteries vasculopathy in deep ICH, we compared characteristics of ICH (including volume) according to the anatomic distribution of ICH in multiple linear regression. RESULTS:VKAs-ICH accounted for 83 patients, that is, 15% (95% confidence intervals, 12-18) of ICH in our cohort. The use of VKAs did not influence anatomic distribution of ICH. The impact of VKAs on ICH volume differed according to ICH location: in nonlobar ICH, VKAs use was associated with significant larger ICH volumes (median volume 25 mL vs 12 mL; P=0.002). In lobar ICH, VKAs use did not influence the volume (median 26 mL vs 30 mL; P=0.507). CONCLUSIONS: A similar anatomic distribution of ICH in patients with or without VKAs suggests that VKAs should not be considered as a cause of ICH because both locations are usually due to different vasculopathies (deep perforating arteries vasculopathy in deep and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in lobar). The different impact of VKAs on ICH volumes according to location suggests a different susceptibility of these vasculopathies to VKAs. This finding may lead to specific therapeutic strategies.
Authors: Adrian R Parry-Jones; Mario Di Napoli; Joshua N Goldstein; Floris H B M Schreuder; Sami Tetri; Turgut Tatlisumak; Bernard Yan; Koen M van Nieuwenhuizen; Nelly Dequatre-Ponchelle; Matthew Lee-Archer; Solveig Horstmann; Duncan Wilson; Fulvio Pomero; Luca Masotti; Christine Lerpiniere; Daniel Agustin Godoy; Abigail S Cohen; Rik Houben; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Paolo Pennati; Luigi Fenoglio; David Werring; Roland Veltkamp; Edith Wood; Helen M Dewey; Charlotte Cordonnier; Catharina J M Klijn; Fabrizio Meligeni; Stephen M Davis; Juha Huhtakangas; Julie Staals; Jonathan Rosand; Atte Meretoja Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Carlos Estevez-Fraga; Maria Molina-Sanchez; Rodrigo Alvarez-Velasco; Pablo Agüero-Rabes; Leticia Crespo-Araico; Elena Viedma-Guiard; Antonio Cruz-Culebras; Consuelo Matute; Rocio Vera; Alicia De Felipe-Mimbrera; Jaime Masjuan Vallejo Journal: Stroke Res Treat Date: 2018-08-02
Authors: Rik Houben; Floris H B M Schreuder; Kim J Bekelaar; Danny Claessens; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Julie Staals Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: David J Seiffge; Martina B Goeldlin; Turgut Tatlisumak; Philippe Lyrer; Urs Fischer; Stefan T Engelter; David J Werring Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 4.849