Literature DB >> 23287753

Quantification of anterior cortical bone removal and intermeniscal ligament damage at the tibial nail entry zone using parapatellar and retropatellar approaches.

Jesse E Bible1, Ankeet A Choxi, Sravan Dhulipala, Jason M Evans, Hassan R Mir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Anterior cortical bone removal at the tibial nail entry zone has been shown to alter biomechanical properties of the proximal tibia. However, no study has quantified the amount of bone removed. The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of anterior bone removed at the nail entry zone and assess damage to adjacent intra-articular structures using both parapatellar and retropatellar techniques.
METHODS: The study was performed using 36 cadaveric knees (18 medial parapatellar and 18 retropatellar approaches). A guide pin was placed in the anatomic safe zone using fluoroscopic guidance and a 12.5-mm entry reamer used to open medullary canal. Soft tissues were removed, damage to intra-articular structures recorded, and size of osseous defect created in proximal tibia measured.
RESULTS: The surface area of bone removed with portal creation was not significantly larger with retropatellar (228.4 ± 38.1 mm) versus parapatellar technique (207.9 ± 33.4 mm(2); P = 0.108). This was substantially different than if the entry hole was perfectly round (122.7 mm(2)). No knee went without some damage to intra-articular structures using the parapatellar technique, as opposed to 33% knees with retropatellar technique (P = 0.019). Intermeniscal (IM) ligament was damaged in 83% parapatellar and 56% retropatellar knees (P = 0.146).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial amount of anterior bone is removed during nail entry portal creation using both parapatellar and retropatellar techniques. Intra-articular structure damage, most commonly IM ligament disruption, was also found to occur at a lower rate with retropatellar technique. Avoidance of both anterior bone removal and IM ligament damage may not be possible because of size and geometrical constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23287753     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318283f675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Faceoff: Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing for Tibia Fractures.

Authors:  Lisa K Cannada; Hassan R Mir; Stephen A Kottmeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Retro-patellar approach in telescopic nailing of the tibia in children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Ozan A Erdal; Baris Gorgun; Ilker A Sarikaya; Muharrem Inan
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Investigating and defining outcomes of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Simon Thwaites; Dominic Thewlis; Kelly Hall; Mark Rickman
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Character, Incidence, and Predictors of Knee Pain and Activity After Infrapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of an Isolated Tibia Fracture.

Authors:  William Obremskey; Julie Agel; Kristin Archer; Philip To; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients.

Authors:  Nils Jan Bleeker; Inge H F Reininga; Bryan J M van de Wall; Laurent A M Hendrickx; Frank J P Beeres; Kaj Ten Duis; Job N Doornberg; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.512

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.