Literature DB >> 23287752

Cortical encroachment after cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur: evaluation of a more anatomic radius of curvature.

Daniel B Bazylewicz1, Kenneth A Egol, Kenneth J Koval.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : A unique complication of using full-length intramedullary nails for pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures is nail penetration of the anterior cortex at the distal end of the femur because of a mismatch of the anatomic femoral bow with that of currently available cephalomedullary nails (CMNs). This study was performed to determine the rate of distal femoral cortical penetration after stabilization of the proximal femur in a consecutive series of patients using a long CMN with a curvature of 180 cm and to examine the final location of the nails within the femoral canal.
DESIGN: : Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: : Level 1 trauma center with tertiary care. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: : Between June 2005 and September 2008, 271 consecutive proximal femoral fractures or impending fractures were stabilized using a specially designed CMN [pertrochanteric nail (PTN) system; Biomet, Warsaw, IN]. Fifty-seven fractures were excluded because of inadequate lateral radiographs, leaving 214 nails in 212 patients available for analysis. INTERVENTION: : The proximal femur fractures or impending fractures were stabilized with a full-length CMN with a shaft diameter of 11 mm and a radius of curvature of 180 cm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: : Nail position was determined from the lateral radiograph, which included the minimal distance from the nail to the anterior cortex of the distal femur and the relative position of the nail within the medullary canal, at a level within 2 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella. Based on the nail position within the distal femoral canal, the following were calculated: (1) the overall rate of distal femoral anterior cortical penetration, (2) the distribution of nail distances to the anterior cortex, and (3) the proportion of nails lying in each quarter of the space available for the nail.
RESULTS: : Four surgeries (1.9%) were performed for pathologic fracture and 22 (10.3%) for impending pathologic fracture. The remaining 188 CMNs were used to stabilize OTA Type 31A1 fractures (52 nails, 24.3%), Type 31A2 fractures (62 nails, 29%), Type 31A3 fractures (15 nails, 6.5%), and Type 32 fractures (59 nails, 27.6%). Of the 214 cases available for radiographic analysis, there was 1 case (0.47%) of distal femoral anterior cortical penetration. Of the remaining 213 CMNs, 40% of nails ended up far anterior, 48% anterior, 10% posterior, and 2% far posterior. Sixteen percent (1/6) were within 3 mm of the anterior cortex and half were within 7 mm. The average distance from nail to the anterior cortex was 8.5 mm.
CONCLUSION: : Use of a CMN with a radius of curvature of 180 cm to stabilize the proximal femur resulted in a very low rate of distal femoral anterior cortical penetration. However, most of the intramedullary nails ended up in the anterior half of the space available for the nail with 16% within 3 mm of the anterior cortex. These results highlight the importance of being aware of the complication of anterior cortical impingement and perforation during CMN insertion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23287752     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318283f24f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  16 in total

1.  Use of blocking guidewires to ensure accurate placement of femoral nails.

Authors:  T Sinnett; I Sinha; R Bhattacharya
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  An approach to automated measuring morphological parameters of proximal femora on three-dimensional models.

Authors:  Junlei Hu; Liyu Xu; Mengjie Jing; Henghui Zhang; Liao Wang; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  A Simple Method to Improve Detection of Femoral Nail Abutment in the Distal Femur: A Computer Modeling Study.

Authors:  Harminder Sarai; Beat Schmutz; Michael Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  CORR Insights®: A Simple Method to Improve Detection of Femoral Nail Abutment in the Distal Femur: A Computer Modeling Study.

Authors:  Thomas A DeCoster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  The Global Burden of Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Seth M Tarrant; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Mismatch of long Gamma intramedullary nail with bow of the femur: Does radius of curvature of the nail increase risk of distal femoral complications?

Authors:  A Shetty; P M Shenoy; R Swaminathan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-21

7.  Distal femoral complications following antegrade intramedullary nail placement.

Authors:  Amanda J Fantry; Gregory Elia; Bryan G Vopat; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-03-24

8.  Risk Factors for Anterior Cortical Impingement of Short Cephalomedullary Nail in Chinese Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fracture.

Authors:  Shaobo Nie; Ming Li; Jiantao Li; Yanpeng Zhao; Xiang Cui; Gaoxiang Xu; Licheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Quantification of cephalomedullary nail fit in the femur using 3D computer modelling: a comparison between 1.0 and 1.5m bow designs.

Authors:  Beat Schmutz; Jayani Amarathunga; Stanley Kmiec; Prasad Yarlagadda; Michael Schuetz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Curvature of the Femoral Canal in 426 Chinese Femurs.

Authors:  Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Jing-Xin Zhao; Li-Cheng Zhang; An-Hua Long; Li-Hai Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.