Literature DB >> 23286857

Why do I treat HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with a nucleoside analogue.

Hong Ma1, Jidong Jia.   

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a worldwide public health problem which represents an enormous economic and social burden. Convincing evidence has shown that persistent active viral replication is an independent predictor of disease progression. Therefore, sustained suppression of HBV replication is the cornerstone for preventing the progression of disease and prolonging survival in patients with CHB. Pivotal clinical trials and real-world studies show that nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are potent suppressors of HBV DNA replication with very good safety profiles. Although 1-year treatment with NAs only results in a modest rate of HBeAg seroconversion, extended treatment could increase this rate. Profound suppression of HBV DNA can result in histological improvement and a clinical benefit with a decrease in disease progression in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment must be begun with a highly potent and low resistant regimen to obtain long-term suppression of viral replication. An alternative solution may be a roadmap approach in which an inexpensive antiviral drug is started and another drug is added-on or switched-to if there is a suboptimal on-treatment decrease in HBV DNA. Clinical evidence has shown that once HBV DNA is suppressed and long-term HBeAg seroconversion is achieved, NAs can be stopped. In summary, high antiviral efficacy, excellent tolerance, extensive applicability, clearly proven histological improvement and long-term clinical benefit all make NAs the preferred choice for the management of CHB in most patients.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23286857     DOI: 10.1111/liv.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  4 in total

1.  Does hepatitis B seroconversion affect survival outcome in patients with hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Vincent S K Yip; Tan To Cheung; Ronnie T P Poon; Thomas Yau; James Fung; Wing Chiu Dai; Albert C Y Chan; Siu Ho Chok; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-14

2.  Histological outcome for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir vs lamivudine-based therapy.

Authors:  Jia-Li Wang; Xin-Fang Du; Shao-Long Chen; Yi-Qi Yu; Jing Wang; Xi-Qi Hu; Ling-Yun Shao; Jia-Zhen Chen; Xin-Hua Weng; Wen-Hong Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Evaluation of the dynamic pattern of viral evolution in patients with virological breakthrough during treatment with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs by ultra‑deep pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Shaolong Chen; Jing Wu; Erli Gu; Yaojie Shen; Feifei Wang; Wenhong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  rtM204Q may serve as a novel lamivudine-resistance-associated mutation of hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Zhihui Xu; Yan Wang; Xiaodong Li; Liming Liu; Li Chen; Shaojie Xin; Dongping Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.