OBJECTIVES: To determine if post-discharge telephonic case management (CM) reduces emergent hospital readmissions for select high-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized control study of the effect of hospital discharge planning from health plan telephonic case managers on readmissions for high-risk patients. High risk was defined as having an initial discharge major diagnosis of gastrointestinal, heart, or lower respiratory and length of stay of 3 days or more. The intervention group (N = 1994) received telephonic outreach and engagement within 24 hours of discharge and their calls were made in descending risk order to engage the highest risk first. The control group (N = 1994) received delayed telephonic outreach and engagement 48 hours after discharge notification and no call order by risk was applied. Comparison groups had statistically equivalent characteristics at baseline (P > .05). RESULTS: The intent-to-treat 60-day readmission rate for the treatment group was 7.4% versus 9.6% for the control group (P = .01), representing a 22% relative reduction in all-cause readmissions. Two post hoc assessments were conducted to identify potential mechanisms of action for this effect and showed that the treatment group had more physician visits and prescription drug fills following initial discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Telephonic CM reduces the likelihood of 60-day readmissions for select high-risk patients. This study suggests that prioritizing telephonic outreach to a select group of highrisk patients based on their discharge date and risk severity is an effective case management strategy. Future studies should explore patients' activity beyond phone calls to further explain the mechanism for readmission reduction.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine if post-discharge telephonic case management (CM) reduces emergent hospital readmissions for select high-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized control study of the effect of hospital discharge planning from health plan telephonic case managers on readmissions for high-risk patients. High risk was defined as having an initial discharge major diagnosis of gastrointestinal, heart, or lower respiratory and length of stay of 3 days or more. The intervention group (N = 1994) received telephonic outreach and engagement within 24 hours of discharge and their calls were made in descending risk order to engage the highest risk first. The control group (N = 1994) received delayed telephonic outreach and engagement 48 hours after discharge notification and no call order by risk was applied. Comparison groups had statistically equivalent characteristics at baseline (P > .05). RESULTS: The intent-to-treat 60-day readmission rate for the treatment group was 7.4% versus 9.6% for the control group (P = .01), representing a 22% relative reduction in all-cause readmissions. Two post hoc assessments were conducted to identify potential mechanisms of action for this effect and showed that the treatment group had more physician visits and prescription drug fills following initial discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Telephonic CM reduces the likelihood of 60-day readmissions for select high-risk patients. This study suggests that prioritizing telephonic outreach to a select group of highrisk patients based on their discharge date and risk severity is an effective case management strategy. Future studies should explore patients' activity beyond phone calls to further explain the mechanism for readmission reduction.
Authors: Jacob K Greenberg; Ridhima Guniganti; Eric J Arias; Kshitij Desai; Chad W Washington; Yan Yan; Hua Weng; Chengjie Xiong; Emily Fondahn; DeWitte T Cross; Christopher J Moran; Keith M Rich; Michael R Chicoine; Rajat Dhar; Ralph G Dacey; Colin P Derdeyn; Gregory J Zipfel Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Aaron L Leppin; Michael R Gionfriddo; Maya Kessler; Juan Pablo Brito; Frances S Mair; Katie Gallacher; Zhen Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Tanya Sylvester; Kasey Boehmer; Henry H Ting; M Hassan Murad; Nathan D Shippee; Victor M Montori Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Naina Sinha Gregory; Jane J Seley; Savira Kochhar Dargar; Naveen Galla; Linda M Gerber; Jennifer I Lee Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Lesley Charles; Lisa Jensen; Jacqueline M I Torti; Jasneet Parmar; Bonnie Dobbs; Peter George Jaminal Tian Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2020-06
Authors: Amanda Jayakody; Erin Passmore; Christopher Oldmeadow; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Eunice Simons; Aaron Cashmore; Louise Maher; Kiel Hennessey; Jacinta Bunfield; Maurice Terare; Andrew Milat; Rob Sanson-Fisher Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2018-05-18
Authors: Maurice A Lembeck; Lau C Thygesen; Birgitte Dreyer Sørensen; Lisbeth Lumby Rasmussen; Ellen A Holm Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 2.655