Literature DB >> 23286507

Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: the case of English and Russian.

Andriy Myachykov1, Christoph Scheepers, Simon Garrod, Dominic Thompson, Olga Fedorova.   

Abstract

We analysed how syntactic flexibility influences sentence production in two different languages-English and Russian. In Experiment 1, speakers were instructed to produce as many structurally different descriptions of transitive-event pictures as possible. Consistent with the syntactically more flexible Russian grammar, Russian participants produced more descriptions and used a greater variety of structures than their English counterparts. In Experiment 2, a different sample of participants provided single-sentence descriptions of the same picture materials while their eye movements were recorded. In this task, English and Russian participants almost exclusively produced canonical subject-verb-object active-voice structures. However, Russian participants took longer to plan their sentences, as reflected in longer sentence onset latencies and eye-voice spans for the sentence-initial subject noun. This cross-linguistic difference in processing load diminished toward the end of the sentence. Stepwise generalized linear model analyses showed that the greater sentence-initial processing load registered in Experiment 2 corresponded to the greater amount of syntactic competition from available alternatives (Experiment 1), suggesting that syntactic flexibility is costly regardless of the language in use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23286507     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.754910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  5 in total

1.  Salience Effects: L2 Sentence Production as a Window on L1 Speech Planning.

Authors:  Inés Antón-Méndez; Chip Gerfen; Miguel Ramos
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

2.  Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall.

Authors:  Maartje van de Velde; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

3.  Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.

Authors:  Sebastian Sauppe; Kamal K Choudhary; Nathalie Giroud; Damián E Blasi; Elisabeth Norcliffe; Shikha Bhattamishra; Mahima Gulati; Aitor Egurtzegi; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Martin Meyer; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Variation isn't that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty.

Authors:  Matt Hunt Gardner; Eva Uffing; Nicholas Van Vaeck; Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Verb bias and verb-specific competition effects on sentence production.

Authors:  Malathi Thothathiri; Daniel G Evans; Sonali Poudel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.