Literature DB >> 23285736

Effect of matrix on cardiomyocyte viscoelastic properties in 2D culture.

Sandra Deitch1, Bruce Z Gao, Delphine Dean.   

Abstract

Cardiomyocyte phenotype changes significantly in 2D culture systems depending on the substrate composition and organization. Given the variety of substrates that are used both for basic cardiac cell culture studies and for regenerative medicine applications, there is a critical need to understand how the different matrices influence cardiac cell mechanics. In the current study, the mechanical properties of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes cultured in a subconfluent layer upon aligned and unaligned collagen and fibronectin matrices were assessed over a two week period using atomic force microscopy. The elastic modulus was estimated by fitting the Hertz model to force curve data and the percent relaxation was determined from stress relaxation curves. The Quasilinear Viscoelastic (QLV) and Standard Linear Solid (SLS) models were fit to the stress relaxation data. Cardiomyocyte cellular mechanical properties were found to be highly dependent on matrix composition and organization as well as time in culture. It was observed that the cells stiffened and relaxed less over the first 3 to 5 days in culture before reaching a plateau in their mechanical properties. After day 5, cells on aligned matrices were stiffer than cells on unaligned matrices and cells on fibronectin matrices were stiffer than cells on collagen matrices. No such significant trends in percent relaxation measurements were observed but the QLV model fit the data very well. These results were correlated with observed changes in cellular structure associated with culture on the different substrates and analyzed for cell-to-cell variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23285736      PMCID: PMC3539228     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biomech        ISSN: 1556-5297


  46 in total

Review 1.  The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control.

Authors:  S Huang; D E Ingber
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  The effects of morphology, confluency, and phenotype on whole-cell mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Michael J Jaasma; Wesley M Jackson; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?

Authors:  Eric M Darling; Stefan Zauscher; Joel A Block; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  E M Darling; S Zauscher; F Guilak
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Role of cytoskeletal components in stress-relaxation behavior of adherent vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Jason D Hemmer; Jiro Nagatomi; Scott T Wood; Alexey A Vertegel; Delphine Dean; Martine Laberge
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Cross-bridge cycling gives rise to spatiotemporal heterogeneity of dynamic subcellular mechanics in cardiac myocytes probed with atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Evren U Azeloglu; Kevin D Costa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  Methods in cardiomyocyte isolation, culture, and gene transfer.

Authors:  William E Louch; Katherine A Sheehan; Beata M Wolska
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Transverse stiffness of myofibrils of skeletal and cardiac muscles studied by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Nao Akiyama; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Yuki Kunioka; Yasutake Saeki; Takenori Yamada
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 9.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.709

10.  Effects of serum deprivation on the mechanical properties of adherent vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  J D Hemmer; D Dean; A Vertegel; E Langan; M LaBerge
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of blocking integrin β1 and N-cadherin cellular interactions on mechanical properties of vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Aesha Desai; Sandra Geraghty; Delphine Dean
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  The (dys)functional extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Nathan D Bade; Corinne N Riggin; Sijia Zhang; Philip G Haines; Katy L Ong; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-04-27

3.  Effects of substrate stiffness on dental pulp stromal cells in culture.

Authors:  Laura Datko Williams; Amanda Farley; Matthew Cupelli; Satish Alapati; Marian S Kennedy; Delphine Dean
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  The Effect of Substrate Stiffness on Cardiomyocyte Action Potentials.

Authors:  Sean D Boothe; Jackson D Myers; Seokwon Pok; Junping Sun; Yutao Xi; Raymond M Nieto; Jie Cheng; Jeffrey G Jacot
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 5.  Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Claudia Tanja Mierke
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-09

6.  Heart Regeneration with Embryonic Cardiac Progenitor Cells and Cardiac Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Shuo Tian; Qihai Liu; Leonid Gnatovskiy; Peter X Ma; Zhong Wang
Journal:  J Stem Cell Transplant Biol       Date:  2015-04-20

7.  Mechanical properties of stem cells from different sources during vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation.

Authors:  Ruikai Chen; Delphine Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell Biomech       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Engineering hiPSC cardiomyocyte in vitro model systems for functional and structural assessment.

Authors:  Alison Schroer; Gaspard Pardon; Erica Castillo; Cheavar Blair; Beth Pruitt
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.