Literature DB >> 2328467

Interest in alternative birthplaces among women in Ottawa-Carleton.

B Soderstrom1, P J Stewart, C Kaitell, M Chamberlain.   

Abstract

Birthing rooms, birth centres and home birth have been proposed as alternatives to the traditional in-hospital caserooms to meet the needs of women and their families more effectively. We performed a descriptive survey to determine the level of interest of childbearing women in the Ottawa-Carleton region in these birthplaces and to examine the characteristics of women who express an interest in using them. Of the 1629 women who gave birth between July 1 and Aug. 28, 1987, 1115 (68.4%) completed a self-administered questionnaire during the pregnancy, in the early postpartum period in hospital or at home. Of the respondents 577 (53.1%) said they would choose the caseroom, 316 (29.1%) the birthing room, 165 (15.2%) the birth centre and 30 (2.8%) home birth. The women who expressed an interest in a birthplace other than the caseroom were more likely than the others to be older, married, well-educated and interested in midwifery services and to breastfeed their babies (p less than 0.05). They were also more likely to have had a low-intervention vaginal birth (p less than 0.05). The interest expressed in birthing rooms, birth centres and home birth suggests that these alternatives should be considered for inclusion in the health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2328467      PMCID: PMC1451764     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  Alternative birth centers.

Authors:  A Rice; E Carty
Journal:  Can Nurse       Date:  1977-11

2.  Home birth: "we did it, all of us".

Authors:  B Goldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Legalization of midwifery and the issue of home births.

Authors:  C McCourt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Alternative birthing center: experience in a teaching obstetric service.

Authors:  J J Barton; S Rovner; K Puls; P A Read
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Family-centered maternity care: the Canadian picture.

Authors:  S Post
Journal:  Dimens Health Serv       Date:  1981-06

6.  A homestyle delivery program in a university hospital.

Authors:  A J Rollins; J A Kaplan; M E Ratkay; R C Goodlin; J S Shaw; R P Wennberg
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 0.493

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

2.  In search of a common agenda for planned home birth in america.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.