Literature DB >> 23284543

1,4-Dibromo-butane-2,3-dione.

De-Xin Zai1.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(4)H(4)Br(2)O(2), contains one half-mol-ecule, being located about a centre of inversion. In the crystal, there are no significant inter-molecular inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23284543      PMCID: PMC3515323          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the uses of 1,4-dibromo­butane-2,3-dione, see: Gogte et al. (1967 ▶). For the synthesis of 1,4-dibromo­butane-2,3-dione, see: Ruggli & Herzog (1946 ▶). For the cystal structure of the 1,4-di­chloro analogue, see: Ducourant et al. (1986 ▶). For bond–length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H4Br2O2 M = 243.89 Orthorhombic, a = 6.945 (1) Å b = 5.542 (1) Å c = 17.238 (3) Å V = 663.5 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 12.13 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.195, T max = 0.377 614 measured reflections 614 independent reflections 319 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.077 3 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.065 wR(F 2) = 0.108 S = 0.93 614 reflections 37 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.65 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global, n1. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H4Br2O2Dx = 2.442 Mg m3
Mr = 243.89Melting point < 395 K
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 6.945 (1) Åθ = 9–14°
b = 5.542 (1) ŵ = 12.13 mm1
c = 17.238 (3) ÅT = 298 K
V = 663.5 (2) Å3Cube, yellow
Z = 40.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 456
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer319 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.077
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.4°
ω/2θ scansh = 0→8
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −6→6
Tmin = 0.195, Tmax = 0.377l = −20→20
614 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
614 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.108H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.93w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
614 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
37 parametersΔρmax = 0.65 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.60 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br0.96430 (19)0.17863 (19)0.67746 (8)0.0634 (5)
O0.8640 (13)0.2368 (15)0.5056 (4)0.062 (2)
C11.0276 (16)0.4425 (18)0.6134 (6)0.055 (3)
H1A0.96890.58750.63420.066*
H1B1.16610.46520.61380.066*
C20.9577 (15)0.4056 (11)0.5267 (6)0.039 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br0.0755 (7)0.0501 (7)0.0647 (9)−0.0027 (7)0.0041 (7)0.0097 (6)
O0.076 (5)0.036 (3)0.073 (6)−0.026 (5)−0.019 (5)0.007 (3)
C10.045 (6)0.068 (7)0.052 (7)0.000 (6)0.009 (6)−0.016 (7)
C20.033 (5)0.028 (4)0.057 (7)0.013 (6)0.023 (5)0.007 (5)
Br—C11.885 (10)C1—H1A0.9700
O—C21.196 (11)C1—H1B0.9700
C1—C21.585 (9)C2—C2i1.512 (16)
C2—C1—Br112.4 (6)H1A—C1—H1B107.9
C2—C1—H1A109.1O—C2—C2i124.6 (12)
Br—C1—H1A109.1O—C2—C1123.7 (8)
C2—C1—H1B109.1C2i—C2—C1111.4 (10)
Br—C1—H1B109.1
Br—C1—C2—O4.7 (13)Br—C1—C2—C2i−169.0 (8)
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis of potential anticancer agents. I. Synthesis of substituted thiophenes.

Authors:  V N Gogte; L G Shah; B D Tilak; K N Gadekar; M B Sahasrabudhe
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.457

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.