Literature DB >> 23284388

Poly[(μ(3)-hydrogenphosphato)(4H-1,2,4-triazole-κN(1))zinc].

Hafid Aitenneite1, Abdeslam El Bouari, Said Sebti, Mohamed Saadi, Lahcen El Ammari, Karim Adil.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [class="Chemical">Zn(HPO(4))(C(2)class="Chemical">pan class="Species">H(3)N(3))](n), contains one Zn(2+) cation, one (HPO(4))(2-) anion and a 1,2,4 triazole ligand. The Zn(2+) cation is coordinated in a quite regular tetra-hedral geometry by O atoms from three phosphate groups and a tertiary N atom from the triazole ring. Each phosphate anion is connected to three Zn(II) cations, leading to a series of corrugated organic-inorganic layers parallel to the ac plane. The overall structure involves stacking of complex hybrid organic-inorganic layers along the b axis. Cohesion in the crystal is ensured by an infinite three-dimensional network of N-H⋯O and O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the phosphate groups and the triazole ligands.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23284388      PMCID: PMC3515161          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to potential applications of similar compounds, see: Horcajada et al. (2012 ▶); Li et al. (2012 ▶); Wang et al. (2012 ▶); Yoon et al. (2012 ▶). For hybrid compounds with pan class="Chemical">zinc phosphates, see: Umeyama et al. (2012 ▶); Horike et al. (2012 ▶). For class="Chemical">phosclass="Chemical">pho­nate, carboxyl­ate and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">azolate compounds, see: Stock & Biswas (2012 ▶). For bond-valence analysis, see: Brown & Altermatt (1985 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[class="Chemical">Zn(Hclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PO4)(C2H3N3)] M = 230.42 Orthorhombic, a = 8.5467 (13) Å b = 8.4344 (12) Å c = 8.9674 (13) Å V = 646.43 (16) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.01 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.24 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1999 ▶) T min = 0.511, T max = 0.638 8746 measured reflections 3318 independent reflections 3207 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.029

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021 wR(F 2) = 0.051 S = 1.04 3318 reflections 100 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.40 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 1184 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.020 (6) Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and pan class="Disease">DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to class="Chemical">preclass="Chemical">pare material for class="Chemical">publication: PLATON (Sclass="Chemical">pek, 2009 ▶) and class="Chemical">publCIF (Westriclass="Chemical">p, 2010 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044182/sj5276sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044182/sj5276Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Zn(HPO4)(C2H3N3)]F(000) = 456
Mr = 230.42Dx = 2.368 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pca21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2acCell parameters from 3318 reflections
a = 8.5467 (13) Åθ = 4.1–40.2°
b = 8.4344 (12) ŵ = 4.01 mm1
c = 8.9674 (13) ÅT = 296 K
V = 646.43 (16) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.24 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
Bruker X8 APEXII diffractometer3318 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3207 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.029
φ and ω scansθmax = 40.2°, θmin = 4.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1999)h = −14→15
Tmin = 0.511, Tmax = 0.638k = −13→15
8746 measured reflectionsl = −16→14
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.051w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0181P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
3318 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = −1.40 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1184 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.020 (6)
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on all data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.832301 (12)0.167666 (13)0.51177 (2)0.01245 (3)
P10.94990 (3)0.03491 (3)0.21240 (3)0.01101 (4)
O10.84382 (9)0.01275 (12)0.34886 (10)0.01568 (14)
O21.00560 (10)−0.12805 (10)0.16133 (10)0.01765 (14)
O30.87260 (11)0.13060 (13)0.09170 (11)0.02070 (16)
O41.09420 (9)0.13727 (12)0.26275 (11)0.01867 (15)
H41.16120.07920.29880.028*
N10.85494 (13)0.39236 (14)0.44809 (12)0.01976 (17)
N20.7928 (2)0.50750 (18)0.54065 (17)0.0380 (3)
N30.90713 (16)0.62060 (15)0.35052 (15)0.0269 (2)
H30.94200.69260.29130.032*
C10.8267 (2)0.6419 (2)0.4777 (2)0.0356 (4)
H10.79880.74050.51580.043*
C20.9214 (2)0.46424 (18)0.33568 (19)0.0295 (3)
H20.97150.41360.25680.035*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.01506 (5)0.00996 (5)0.01234 (5)−0.00078 (3)−0.00004 (4)0.00108 (4)
P10.01043 (8)0.00993 (9)0.01266 (9)−0.00027 (7)−0.00016 (8)−0.00024 (8)
O10.0150 (3)0.0176 (4)0.0145 (3)−0.0025 (2)0.0026 (2)−0.0032 (3)
O20.0218 (3)0.0103 (3)0.0209 (3)−0.0001 (3)0.0082 (3)−0.0016 (3)
O30.0171 (3)0.0248 (4)0.0202 (4)0.0019 (3)−0.0041 (3)0.0069 (3)
O40.0130 (3)0.0132 (3)0.0298 (4)−0.0019 (2)−0.0056 (3)0.0002 (3)
N10.0269 (4)0.0113 (4)0.0212 (4)0.0000 (3)0.0032 (3)0.0026 (3)
N20.0693 (10)0.0169 (5)0.0279 (7)0.0023 (6)0.0179 (6)0.0004 (4)
N30.0365 (6)0.0144 (4)0.0299 (5)−0.0042 (4)0.0016 (5)0.0081 (4)
C10.0667 (13)0.0122 (5)0.0279 (7)−0.0014 (6)0.0031 (6)−0.0021 (5)
C20.0412 (7)0.0161 (5)0.0312 (7)0.0034 (5)0.0128 (5)0.0091 (5)
Zn1—O3i1.9179 (9)O4—H40.8200
Zn1—O2ii1.9570 (8)N1—C21.3064 (18)
Zn1—O11.9624 (9)N1—N21.3836 (19)
Zn1—N11.9888 (11)N2—C11.299 (2)
P1—O31.5031 (10)N3—C21.331 (2)
P1—O21.5250 (9)N3—C11.343 (2)
P1—O11.5345 (9)N3—H30.8600
P1—O41.5717 (9)C1—H10.9300
O2—Zn1iii1.9570 (8)C2—H20.9300
O3—Zn1iv1.9179 (9)
O3i—Zn1—O2ii111.25 (4)P1—O4—H4109.5
O3i—Zn1—O1102.44 (4)C2—N1—N2107.71 (12)
O2ii—Zn1—O1111.16 (4)C2—N1—Zn1134.92 (11)
O3i—Zn1—N1110.58 (5)N2—N1—Zn1117.34 (9)
O2ii—Zn1—N1106.89 (4)C1—N2—N1105.42 (14)
O1—Zn1—N1114.58 (5)C2—N3—C1105.33 (13)
O3—P1—O2113.89 (6)C2—N3—H3127.3
O3—P1—O1112.33 (5)C1—N3—H3127.3
O2—P1—O1108.30 (5)N2—C1—N3111.50 (16)
O3—P1—O4104.89 (6)N2—C1—H1124.3
O2—P1—O4109.66 (5)N3—C1—H1124.3
O1—P1—O4107.55 (5)N1—C2—N3110.04 (14)
P1—O1—Zn1122.83 (5)N1—C2—H2125.0
P1—O2—Zn1iii125.50 (5)N3—C2—H2125.0
P1—O3—Zn1iv139.29 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3···O2v0.861.992.8427 (15)175
O4—H4···O1vi0.821.802.5978 (12)164
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N3—H3⋯O2i 0.861.992.8427 (15)175
O4—H4⋯O1ii 0.821.802.5978 (12)164

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  9 in total

1.  Rational synthesis of noncentrosymmetric metal-organic frameworks for second-order nonlinear optics.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Teng Zhang; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Homochiral metal-organic frameworks for asymmetric heterogeneous catalysis.

Authors:  Minyoung Yoon; Renganathan Srirambalaji; Kimoon Kim
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Metal-organic frameworks in biomedicine.

Authors:  Patricia Horcajada; Ruxandra Gref; Tarek Baati; Phoebe K Allan; Guillaume Maurin; Patrick Couvreur; Gérard Férey; Russell E Morris; Christian Serre
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites.

Authors:  Norbert Stock; Shyam Biswas
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Coordination-network-based ionic plastic crystal for anhydrous proton conductivity.

Authors:  Satoshi Horike; Daiki Umeyama; Munehiro Inukai; Tomoya Itakura; Susumu Kitagawa
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Metal-organic frameworks for separations.

Authors:  Jian-Rong Li; Julian Sculley; Hong-Cai Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Inherent proton conduction in a 2D coordination framework.

Authors:  Daiki Umeyama; Satoshi Horike; Munehiro Inukai; Tomoya Itakura; Susumu Kitagawa
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.