OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Bishop score to predict the mode of delivery in women scheduled for induction of labor at term. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to July 2009. Studies reporting on both the Bishop score and the outcome of labor in women scheduled for induction of labor at term were eligible. We used a bivariate model to estimate a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for the outcome cesarean delivery. RESULTS: We included 40 primary articles reporting on 13,757 women. Study quality was mediocre. The sROC curve of the Bishop score in the prediction of cesarean delivery indicated a poor predictive capacity. For the prediction of cesarean delivery, the sensitivity-specificity combinations were 47%-75%, 61%-53% and 78%-44% for the Bishop scores of 4, 5, and 6, respectively. For a Bishop score below 9, the sensitivity-specificity combination was 95%-30%. CONCLUSION: The Bishop score is a poor predictor for the outcome of induced labor at term and should not be used to decide whether to induce labor or not. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Bishop score to predict the mode of delivery in women scheduled for induction of labor at term. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to July 2009. Studies reporting on both the Bishop score and the outcome of labor in women scheduled for induction of labor at term were eligible. We used a bivariate model to estimate a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for the outcome cesarean delivery. RESULTS: We included 40 primary articles reporting on 13,757 women. Study quality was mediocre. The sROC curve of the Bishop score in the prediction of cesarean delivery indicated a poor predictive capacity. For the prediction of cesarean delivery, the sensitivity-specificity combinations were 47%-75%, 61%-53% and 78%-44% for the Bishop scores of 4, 5, and 6, respectively. For a Bishop score below 9, the sensitivity-specificity combination was 95%-30%. CONCLUSION: The Bishop score is a poor predictor for the outcome of induced labor at term and should not be used to decide whether to induce labor or not. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Authors: Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hallcor Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Laura E Masson; Christine M O'Brien; Rekha Gautam; Giju Thomas; James C Slaughter; Mack Goldberg; Kelly Bennett; Jennifer Herington; Jeff Reese; Emad Elsamadicy; J Michael Newton; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: L C Carlson; S T Romero; M L Palmeri; A Muñoz Del Rio; S M Esplin; V M Rotemberg; T J Hall; H Feltovich Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Jill M Mitchell; Patrick Dicker; Grace Madigan; Sarah Nicholson; Suzanne Smyth; Fionnuala M Breathnach Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Date: 2022-04-16
Authors: Laura Peralta; Eve Mourier; Christophe Richard; Gilles Charpigny; Thibaut Larcher; Dora Aït-Belkacem; Naveen K Balla; Sophie Brasselet; Mickael Tanter; Marie Muller; Pascale Chavatte-Palmer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240