OBJECTIVE: A videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is generally used to assess dysphagia and aspiration, although false-negative results may be obtained. Saliva aspiration may cause false-negative VFSS findings in elderly people. A radionuclide salivagram can be useful in detecting saliva aspiration. We therefore compared these two methods for the evaluation of patients with aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 50 patients with aspiration pneumonia into this study. All patients underwent VFSS, and were evaluated on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. A salivagram was performed on the day after VFSS and each patient received 1 mL Tc-99 m DTPA sublingually. Both dynamic and delayed images were obtained. RESULTS: Aspiration was observed in 34% of patients by salivagram and in 42% by VFSS. The frequency of tests that were positive for aspiration pneumonia using a combination of the two methods was 52%. Five patients with positive aspiration findings on salivagram were negative on VFSS. The association between VFSS and salivagram findings was significant but the total agreement was 72%. The frequency of aspiration pneumonia was significantly associated with an abnormal salivagram finding. CONCLUSIONS: A salivagram may be a useful method for the evaluation of aspiration in elderly people, and a combination of the VFSS and salivagram methods could enable a more effective investigation of aspiration pneumonia.
OBJECTIVE: A videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is generally used to assess dysphagia and aspiration, although false-negative results may be obtained. Saliva aspiration may cause false-negative VFSS findings in elderly people. A radionuclide salivagram can be useful in detecting saliva aspiration. We therefore compared these two methods for the evaluation of patients with aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 50 patients with aspiration pneumonia into this study. All patients underwent VFSS, and were evaluated on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. A salivagram was performed on the day after VFSS and each patient received 1 mL Tc-99 m DTPA sublingually. Both dynamic and delayed images were obtained. RESULTS: Aspiration was observed in 34% of patients by salivagram and in 42% by VFSS. The frequency of tests that were positive for aspiration pneumonia using a combination of the two methods was 52%. Five patients with positive aspiration findings on salivagram were negative on VFSS. The association between VFSS and salivagram findings was significant but the total agreement was 72%. The frequency of aspiration pneumonia was significantly associated with an abnormal salivagram finding. CONCLUSIONS: A salivagram may be a useful method for the evaluation of aspiration in elderly people, and a combination of the VFSS and salivagram methods could enable a more effective investigation of aspiration pneumonia.
Authors: Peter K M Ku; Ki Wang; Alexander C Vlantis; Evelyn W K Tang; Thomas S C Hui; Ronald Lai; Zenon W C Yeung; Ryan H W Cho; Thomas Law; Simon Y P Chan; Becky Y T Chan; Jeffrey K T Wong; Andrew van Hasselt; Michael C F Tong Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2021-11-27