Literature DB >> 23283413

The predictive value of the exercise ECG for major adverse cardiac events in patients who presented with chest pain in the emergency department.

Judith M Poldervaart1, A Jacob Six, Barbra E Backus, Hector W L de Beaufort, Maarten-Jan M Cramer, Rolf F Veldkamp, E Gijs Mast, Eugène M Buijs, Wouter J Tietge, Björn E Groenemeijer, Luc Cozijnsen, Alexander J Wardeh, Hester M den Ruiter, Pieter A Doevendans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve early diagnostic and therapeutic decision making, we designed the HEART score for chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED). HEART is an acronym of its components: History, ECG, Age, Risk factors and Troponin. Currently, many chest pain patients undergo exercise testing on the consecutive days after presentation. However, it may be questioned how much diagnostic value the exercise ECG adds when the HEART score is already known.
METHODS: A subanalysis was performed of a multicenter prospective validation study of the HEART score, consisting of 248 patients who underwent exercise testing within 7 days after presentation in the ED. Outcome is the predictive value of exercise testing in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks after presentation.
RESULTS: In low-risk patients (HEART score ≤ 3), 63.1 % were negative tests, 28.6 % non-conclusive and 8.3 % positive; the latter were all false positives. In the intermediate-risk group (HEART score 4-6), 30.9 % were negative tests, 60.3 % non-conclusive and 8.8 % positive, half of these positives were false positives. In the high-risk patients (HEART score ≥ 7), 14.3 % were negative tests, 57.1 % non-conclusive and 28.6 % positive, of which half were false positives.
CONCLUSION: In a chest pain population risk stratified with HEART, exercise testing has only a modest contribution to clinical decision making. 50 % of all tests are non-conclusive, with high rates of false positive tests in all three risk groups. In intermediate-risk patients, negative exercise tests may contribute to the exclusion of disease. Clinicians should rather go for sensitive tests, in particular in patients with low HEART scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23283413     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-012-0535-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of exercise treadmill testing with cardiac computed tomography angiography among patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Waleed Ahmed; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Christopher Lothar Schlett; Khurram Nasir; Joao Fontes; Ahmed Tawakol; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study.

Authors:  A Jacob Six; Louise Cullen; Barbra E Backus; Jaimi Greenslade; William Parsonage; Sally Aldous; Pieter A Doevendans; Martin Than
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bassand; Christian W Hamm; Diego Ardissino; Eric Boersma; Andrzej Budaj; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Keith A A Fox; David Hasdai; E Magnus Ohman; Lars Wallentin; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Pre- and early in-hospital procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes: first results of the "German chest pain unit registry".

Authors:  Felix Post; Evangelos Giannitsis; Thomas Riemer; Lars S Maier; Claus Schmitt; Burghard Schumacher; Gerd Heusch; Harald Mudra; Thomas Voigtländer; Rainer Erbel; Harald Darius; Hugo Katus; Christian Hamm; Jochen Senges; Tommaso Gori; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Usefulness of contrast stress-echocardiography or exercise-electrocardiography to predict long-term acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain without electrocardiographic abnormalities or 12-hour troponin elevation.

Authors:  Nicola Gaibazzi; Claudio Reverberi; Luigi Badano
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The patient's interpretation of myocardial infarction symptoms and its role in the decision process to seek treatment: the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Authors:  Inge Kirchberger; Margit Heier; Rupert Wende; Wolfgang von Scheidt; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  W B Gibler; J P Runyon; R C Levy; M R Sayre; R Kacich; C R Hattemer; C Hamilton; J W Gerlach; R A Walsh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Improved outcome in acute coronary syndrome by establishing a chest pain unit.

Authors:  Till Keller; Felix Post; Stergios Tzikas; Astrid Schneider; Sven Arnolds; Oliver Scheiba; Stefan Blankenberg; Thomas Münzel; Sabine Genth-Zotz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.