Literature DB >> 2328174

Postoperative hypoxaemia: comparison of extradural, i.m. and patient-controlled opioid analgesia.

R G Wheatley1, I D Somerville, D J Sapsford, J G Jones.   

Abstract

Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was analysed continuously before and for 24 h after lower abdominal surgery in 30 patients breathing air using one of three postoperative analgesic regimens: i.v. diamorphine using a patient-controlled analgesia system (PCAS), extradural diamorphine or i.m. morphine. Hypoxaemia was defined as SaO2 less than 94% for more than 6 min h-1. Before operation there was no difference between the three analgesia groups assessed by the duration when SaO2 was less than 94%. After operation the pattern of SaO2 vs time distribution was either stable, with little variation from hour to hour with no hypoxaemia, or unstable with large variation with 30% of patients hypoxaemic. Thus three patterns of SaO2 distribution were seen in the postoperative period: stable without hypoxaemia (4/10 PCAS, 0/10 extradural, and 1/10 i.m. patients), unstable without hypoxaemia (4/10 PCAS, 5/10 extradural and 7/10 i.m. patients) and unstable with prolonged nocturnal periods with SaO2 less than 94% for a mean of 17.7 min h-1, 95% confidence limits (CL) 10-25 min h-1, (2/10 PCAS, 2/10 i.m. and 5/10 extradural patients). Before operation, the unstable group with hypoxaemia spent longer at less than 94% SaO2 (mean 4.8 min h-1, 95% CL 1.0-8.6 min h-1) than the stable group (mean 0.4 min h-1, 95% CL 0.17-0.61 min h-1) and this was a predictor of postoperative hypoxaemia. Hypoxaemia occurred in all analgesia groups, but extradural diamorphine tended to cause longer periods. Some patients at risk of postoperative hypoxaemia may be predicted by preoperative monitoring of SaO2 although extradural diamorphine boluses were associated with hypoxaemia in patients with normal preoperative values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2328174     DOI: 10.1093/bja/64.3.267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  13 in total

1.  Nocturnal episodic hypoxemia after ambulatory breast cancer surgery: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia.

Authors:  Gotaro Shirakami; Yuriko Teratani; Kazuhiko Fukuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Postoperative pain control in children.

Authors:  N S Morton; L R McNicol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-02

4.  Ventilatory responses after major surgery and high dependency care.

Authors:  D Nieuwenhuijs; J Bruce; G B Drummond; P M Warren; P K Wraith; A Dahan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Respiratory muscle strength after upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  B Celli
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve post-operative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Discriminating between the effect of shunt and reduced VA/Q on arterial oxygen saturation is particularly useful in clinical practice.

Authors:  J G Jones; S E Jones
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  [Influence of postoperative pain on morbidity and mortality.].

Authors:  W Seeling; M Rockemann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.

Authors:  Jon H Salicath; Emily Cy Yeoh; Michael H Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 10.  Practical guidelines on the postoperative use of patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly.

Authors:  P Lavand'Homme; M De Kock
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.