OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on the underreporting of sleep relative to objective measurement, a common occurrence among individuals with insomnia. METHOD:Pre-treatment and post-treatment self-report measures of sleep were compared with those obtained from home-based polysomnography (PSG) in 60 adults (mean age = 69.17; 42 women) with comorbid insomnia. The self-report data were published previously in a randomized controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of CBT-I compared with a placebo treatment. RESULTS: Self-report measures significantly underestimated sleep at pre-treatment and CBT-I led to a correction in this discrepancy. There were no significant changes in PSG after CBT-I. Path analysis showed that an increase in an objective proxy measure of sleep quality (i.e., decreased stage N1 sleep) after CBT-I was significantly related to improvements in self-report of sleep, with full mediation by reductions in discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first CBT-I outcome study to analyze discrepancy changes and demonstrate that these changes account for a significant portion of self-report outcome. In addition, improved sleep quality as measured by a decrease in percentage of stage N1 sleep following treatment may be one mechanism that explains why sleep estimation is more accurate following CBT-I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on the underreporting of sleep relative to objective measurement, a common occurrence among individuals with insomnia. METHOD: Pre-treatment and post-treatment self-report measures of sleep were compared with those obtained from home-based polysomnography (PSG) in 60 adults (mean age = 69.17; 42 women) with comorbid insomnia. The self-report data were published previously in a randomized controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of CBT-I compared with a placebo treatment. RESULTS: Self-report measures significantly underestimated sleep at pre-treatment and CBT-I led to a correction in this discrepancy. There were no significant changes in PSG after CBT-I. Path analysis showed that an increase in an objective proxy measure of sleep quality (i.e., decreased stage N1 sleep) after CBT-I was significantly related to improvements in self-report of sleep, with full mediation by reductions in discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first CBT-I outcome study to analyze discrepancy changes and demonstrate that these changes account for a significant portion of self-report outcome. In addition, improved sleep quality as measured by a decrease in percentage of stage N1 sleep following treatment may be one mechanism that explains why sleep estimation is more accurate following CBT-I.
Authors: Miranda V McPhillips; Victoria V Dickson; Pamela Z Cacchione; Junxin Li; Nalaka Gooneratne; Barbara Riegel Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: Gwenyth R Wallen; Alyssa T Brooks; Barbara Whiting; Rosa Clark; Michael C Krumlauf; Li Yang; Melanie L Schwandt; David T George; Vijay A Ramchandani Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2014 Oct-Dec
Authors: Daniel B Kay; Helmet T Karim; Adriane M Soehner; Brant P Hasler; Jeffrey A James; Anne Germain; Martica H Hall; Peter L Franzen; Julie C Price; Eric A Nofzinger; Daniel J Buysse Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Wai Sze Chan; Natalie D Dautovich; Joseph P H McNamara; Ashley Stripling; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Karin McCoy; Christina S McCrae Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: Simon D Kyle; Christopher B Miller; Zoe Rogers; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Kenneth M Macmahon; Colin A Espie Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 5.849