Literature DB >> 23280547

The association between calcium channel blocker use and prostate cancer outcome.

Michael A Poch1, Diana Mehedint, Dawn J Green, Rochelle Payne-Ondracek, Elizabeth T H Fontham, Jeannette T Bensen, Kristopher Attwood, Gregory E Wilding, Khurshid A Guru, Willie Underwood, James L Mohler, Hannelore V Heemers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies indicate that calcium channel blocker (CCB) use is inversely related to prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. The association between CCB use and PCa aggressiveness at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) and outcome after RP was examined.
METHODS: Medication use, PCa aggressiveness and post-RP outcome were retrieved from a prospectively populated database that contains clinical and outcome for RP patients at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) from 1993 to 2010. The database was queried for anti-hypertensive medication use at diagnosis for patients with ≥1 year follow-up. Recurrence was defined using NCCN guidelines. Chi-Square tests assessed the relationship between CCB use and PCa aggressiveness. Cox regression models compared the distribution of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with adjustment for covariates. Results for association between CCB usage and PCa aggressiveness were validated using data from the population-based North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP).
RESULTS: 48%, 37%, and 15% of RPCI's RP patients (n = 875) had low, intermediate, and high aggressive PCa, respectively. 104 (11%) had a history of CCB use. Patients taking CCBs were more likely to be older, have a higher BMI and use additional anti-hypertensive medications. Diagnostic PSA levels, PCa aggressiveness, and margin status were similar for CCB users and non-users. PFS and OS did not differ between the two groups. Tumor aggressiveness was associated with PFS. CCB use in the PCaP study population was not associated with PCa aggressiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: CCB use is not associated with PCa aggressiveness at diagnosis, PFS or OS.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23280547      PMCID: PMC5826547          DOI: 10.1002/pros.22632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  20 in total

1.  Antihypertensive drug use and the risk of prostate cancer (Canada).

Authors:  Linda Perron; Isabelle Bairati; François Harel; François Meyer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Rate and determinants of 10-year persistence with antihypertensive drugs.

Authors:  Boris Lg Van Wijk; Olaf H Klungel; Eibert R Heerdink; Anthonius de Boer
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Long-term outcomes of open radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Ryan P Dorin; Siamak Daneshmand; Mark A Lassoff; Jie Cai; Donald G Skinner; Gary Lieskovsky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The association between antihypertensive drug use and incidence of prostate cancer in Finland: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Kimmo J Kemppainen; Teuvo L J Tammela; Anssi Auvinen; Teemu J Murtola
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Body mass index versus height and weight in relation to blood pressure. Findings for the 10,079 persons in the INTERSALT Study.

Authors:  A R Dyer; P Elliott; M Shipley
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Effects of voltage-gated ion channel modulators on rat prostatic cancer cell proliferation: comparison of strongly and weakly metastatic cell lines.

Authors:  S P Fraser; J A Grimes; M B Djamgoz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Blood pressure and risk of prostate cancer: Cohort Norway (CONOR).

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Lars Vatten; David Gunnell; Pål Romundstad
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Use of blood-pressure-lowering medication and risk of prostate cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort.

Authors:  Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; Anusila Deka; Alpa V Patel; Elizabeth B Bain; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Secondary hypertension: obesity and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Gregory M Singer; John F Setaro
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Antihypertensive drug use and prostate cancer-specific mortality in Finnish men.

Authors:  Aino Siltari; Teemu J Murtola; Kirsi Talala; Kimmo Taari; Teuvo L J Tammela; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Calcium Permeable Channels in Cancer Hallmarks.

Authors:  Sendoa Tajada; Carlos Villalobos
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  CaV channels and cancer: canonical functions indicate benefits of repurposed drugs as cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Paul J Buchanan; Karen D McCloskey
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.733

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.