Literature DB >> 23279959

The contribution of inhibitory deficits to dangerous driving among young people.

Fearghal O'Brien1, Michael Gormley.   

Abstract

A recent theory of adolescent risk taking that may be applicable to young drivers proposed that young people engage in more risks because they are more impulsive. While past research has found that problematic drivers do tend to score higher on measures of impulsivity, most of this research has relied on self-reported behaviours and attitudes. The present study investigates the role of impulsivity using computer-based measures of inhibitory functioning. Young drivers who had been caught speeding by the police were compared with non-offenders on two inhibitory measures: the Stop-signal task and the Go/no-go task. While the two groups did not differ in their performance on the Stop-signal task, there were significant differences between the groups on the Go/no-go task with the offender group displaying lower inhibitory skills. The results of the Go/no-go task were not entirely unambiguous as offenders were also found to have responded to go trials with a faster reaction-time. The implications of these results both for the impulsivity theory of adolescent risk taking and for the more general issue of adolescent risk taking are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23279959     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  8 in total

1.  Changes over 12 months in eye glances during secondary task engagement among novice drivers.

Authors:  Fearghal O'Brien; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon Ehsani; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Association Between Executive Function and Problematic Adolescent Driving.

Authors:  Caitlin N Pope; Lesley A Ross; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.225

3.  Conscientious personality and young drivers' crash risk.

Authors:  Johnathon P Ehsani; Kaigang Li; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Cheyenne Fox Tree-McGrath; Jessamyn G Perlus; Fearghal O'Brien; Sheila G Klauer
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2015-07-29

4.  Personality, Executive Control, and Neurobiological Characteristics Associated with Different Forms of Risky Driving.

Authors:  Thomas G Brown; Marie Claude Ouimet; Manal Eldeb; Jacques Tremblay; Evelyn Vingilis; Louise Nadeau; Jens Pruessner; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Executive Function Capacities, Negative Driving Behavior and Crashes in Young Drivers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walshe; Chelsea Ward McIntosh; Daniel Romer; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Relationships between Personality Traits and Brain Gray Matter Are Different in Risky and Non-risky Drivers.

Authors:  Laura Mas-Cuesta; Sabina Baltruschat; Antonio Cándido; Andrés Catena
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Predicting driving speed from psychological metrics in a virtual reality car driving simulation.

Authors:  Uijong Ju; John Williamson; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Non-invasive brain stimulation can induce paradoxical facilitation. Are these neuroenhancements transferable and meaningful to security services?

Authors:  Jean Levasseur-Moreau; Jerome Brunelin; Shirley Fecteau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.