OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sedative and analgesic effects of intramuscular buprenorphine with either dexmedetomidine or acepromazine, administered as premedication to cats and dogs undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: Forty dogs and 48 cats. METHODS: Animals were assigned to one of four groups, according to anaesthetic premedication and induction agent: buprenorphine 20 μg kg(-1) with either dexmedetomidine (dex) 250 μg m(-2) or acepromazine (acp) 0.03 mg kg(-1), followed by alfaxalone (ALF) or propofol (PRO). Meloxicam was administered preoperatively to all animals and anaesthesia was always maintained using isoflurane. Physiological measures and assessments of pain, sedation and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) were made before and after premedication, intraoperatively, and for up to 24 hours after premedication. Data were analyzed with one-way, two-way and mixed between-within subjects anova, Kruskall-Wallis analyses and Chi squared tests. Results were deemed significant if p ≤ 0.05, except where multiple comparisons were performed (p ≤ 0.005). RESULTS: Cats premedicated with dex were more sedated than cats premedicated with acp (p < 0.001) and ALF doses were lower in dex cats (1.2 ± 1.0 mg kg(-1) ) than acp cats (2.5 ± 1.9 mg kg(-1)) (p = 0.041). There were no differences in sedation in dogs however PRO doses were lower in dex dogs (1.5 ± 0.8 mg kg(-1) ) compared to acp dogs (3.3 ± 1.1 mg kg(-1) ) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups with respect to pain scores or MNT for cats or dogs. CONCLUSION: Choice of dex or acp, when given with buprenorphine, caused minor, clinically detectable, differences in various characteristics of anaesthesia, but not in the level of analgesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A combination of buprenorphine with either acp or dex, followed by either PRO or ALF, and then isoflurane, accompanied by an NSAID, was suitable for anaesthesia in dogs and cats undergoing elective surgery. Choice of sedative agent may influence dose of anaesthetic induction agent.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sedative and analgesic effects of intramuscular buprenorphine with either dexmedetomidine or acepromazine, administered as premedication to cats and dogs undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: Forty dogs and 48 cats. METHODS: Animals were assigned to one of four groups, according to anaesthetic premedication and induction agent: buprenorphine 20 μg kg(-1) with either dexmedetomidine (dex) 250 μg m(-2) or acepromazine (acp) 0.03 mg kg(-1), followed by alfaxalone (ALF) or propofol (PRO). Meloxicam was administered preoperatively to all animals and anaesthesia was always maintained using isoflurane. Physiological measures and assessments of pain, sedation and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) were made before and after premedication, intraoperatively, and for up to 24 hours after premedication. Data were analyzed with one-way, two-way and mixed between-within subjects anova, Kruskall-Wallis analyses and Chi squared tests. Results were deemed significant if p ≤ 0.05, except where multiple comparisons were performed (p ≤ 0.005). RESULTS:Cats premedicated with dex were more sedated than cats premedicated with acp (p < 0.001) and ALF doses were lower in dexcats (1.2 ± 1.0 mg kg(-1) ) than acpcats (2.5 ± 1.9 mg kg(-1)) (p = 0.041). There were no differences in sedation in dogs however PRO doses were lower in dexdogs (1.5 ± 0.8 mg kg(-1) ) compared to acpdogs (3.3 ± 1.1 mg kg(-1) ) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups with respect to pain scores or MNT for cats or dogs. CONCLUSION: Choice of dex or acp, when given with buprenorphine, caused minor, clinically detectable, differences in various characteristics of anaesthesia, but not in the level of analgesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A combination of buprenorphine with either acp or dex, followed by either PRO or ALF, and then isoflurane, accompanied by an NSAID, was suitable for anaesthesia in dogs and cats undergoing elective surgery. Choice of sedative agent may influence dose of anaesthetic induction agent.
Authors: Carolina Quarterone; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Nadia Crosignani; Flávia Augusta de Oliveira; Carlize Lopes; Alfredo Feio da Maia Lima; Antonio Jose de Araújo Aguiar Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Marina C Evangelista; Javier Benito; Beatriz P Monteiro; Ryota Watanabe; Graeme M Doodnaught; Daniel S J Pang; Paulo V Steagall Journal: PeerJ Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 2.984