Literature DB >> 23279085

Venous thromboembolism and the utility of the Padua Prediction Score in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine departments.

M Vardi1, N O Ghanem-Zoubi, R Zidan, V Yurin, H Bitterman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is prevalent in internal medicine (IM) departments. Elderly patients with sepsis and chronic medical conditions are at an increased risk for venous thromboemolism (VTE). The objective of this study was to assess the rate of VTE and the accuracy of the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) to predict VTE in patient with sepsis admitted to IM departments.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data on septic patients admitted to IM departments in a community-based medical center. Additionally, we retrospectively collected VTE risk factors and events throughout a 1-year post hospitalization period. We computed the PPS for every patient, and analyzed the data accordingly.
RESULTS: In total, 1080 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 74.68 ± 16.1 years. The average PPS was 4.86 ± 2.26, and 71.2% of the patients had a positive PPS. Only 17.8% of the patients received anticoagulant prophylaxis during their hospital stay. Seven patients had VTE on admission, 14 (1.29%) acquired in-hospital VTE, and 7 (0.65%) had VTE post discharge throughout 1 year. In all, 21.9% patients died during hospitalization, and the overall survival rate was 64%. PPS was not correlated with anticoagulant administration (P = 0.36), in-hospital VTE (P = 0.23) or 1-year VTE (P = 0.40), but was significantly associated with in-hospital death and survival (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The rate of VTE in medical patients with sepsis in IM departments is low, and PPS lacks granularity in detecting patients at risk of acquiring it. In this population, a positive PPS is highly associated with death, and may reflect a more general co-morbidity and disease severity index.
© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23279085     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of mobility/immobility in thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Fan Ye; Carolyn Stalvey; Matheen A Khuddus; David E Winchester; Hale Z Toklu; Joseph J Mazza; Steven H Yale
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Risk-assessment models for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andrea J Darzi; Allen B Repp; Frederick A Spencer; Rami Z Morsi; Rana Charide; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Kenneth A Bauer; Allison E Burnett; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Susan R Kahn; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Arnav Agarwal; Samer G Karam; Tamara Lotfi; Wojtek Wiercioch; Reem Waziry; Alfonso Iorio; Elie A Akl; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Characterization of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Medical Inpatients Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models.

Authors:  Reza Rafizadeh; Ricky D Turgeon; Josh Batterink; Victoria Su; Anthony Lau
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-12-23

4.  Is Infection an Independent Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism? A Population-Based, Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Kevin P Cohoon; Aneel A Ashrani; Daniel J Crusan; Tanya M Petterson; Kent R Bailey; John A Heit
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Venous thromboembolic events during warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Sylvain Audia; Benoit Bach; Maxime Samson; Daniela Lakomy; Jean-Baptiste Bour; Bénédicte Burlet; Julien Guy; Laurence Duvillard; Marine Branger; Vanessa Leguy-Seguin; Sabine Berthier; Marc Michel; Bernard Bonnotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Risk Assessment in Chinese Hospitalized Patients Comparing the Padua and Caprini Scoring Algorithms.

Authors:  Xiaolan Chen; Lei Pan; Hui Deng; Jingyuan Zhang; Xinjie Tong; He Huang; Min Zhang; Jianlin He; Joseph A Caprini; Yong Wang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of VTE in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Lisa K Moores; Tobias Tritschler; Shari Brosnahan; Marc Carrier; Jacob F Collen; Kevin Doerschug; Aaron B Holley; David Jimenez; Gregoire Le Gal; Parth Rali; Philip Wells
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Venous thromboembolism after community-acquired bacteraemia: a 20-year danish cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Dalager-Pedersen; Mette Søgaard; Henrik C Schønheyder; Reimar W Thomsen; John A Baron; Henrik Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Inadequate and Overprophylaxis When Comparing Perceived Versus Calculated Risk.

Authors:  Rahul Chaudhary; Abdulla Damluji; Bhavina Batukbhai; Martin Sanchez; Eric Feng; Malini Chandra Serharan; Mauro Moscucci
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Assessment of the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients using the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini Risk Assessment Model.

Authors:  Haixia Zhou; Yuehong Hu; Xiaoqian Li; Lan Wang; Maoyun Wang; Jun Xiao; Qun Yi
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.