BACKGROUND: Although many probiotic products are currently available in yogurt or pill form in the United States (US), there is uncertainty surrounding the structure of regulation of these products. As more therapeutic probiotics are developed, changes to existing regulatory process in the United States may be required to meet the needs of patients and users in the population. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases view the regulation of probiotics. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site qualitative study consisting of focus groups of patients with chronic gastrointestinal diseases at three tertiary hospitals: at [institutions removed for blinded review]. RESULTS: We conducted 22 focus groups with 136 patients with major gastrointestinal (GI) diseases between March and August 2009. Participants were not familiar with the existing regulation of probiotic products but wanted assurances of accurate labelling of strain as well as safety. Participants raised concerns that regulation of probiotics might be accompanied by greater costs, reduced access and increased involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Although participants voiced significant doubt of government regulators, they felt that products containing genetically modified probiotic strains should have oversight comparable to that of pharmaceutical drugs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: If GI patient perspectives are indicative of public perceptions of therapeutic probiotics in the United States, consumers may expect more rigorous regulation in the future while simultaneously wanting low costs, easy access and low involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Manufacturers, translational scientists, clinicians and regulators should be sensitive to consumer attitudes when designing, testing and regulating new therapeutic probiotics.
BACKGROUND: Although many probiotic products are currently available in yogurt or pill form in the United States (US), there is uncertainty surrounding the structure of regulation of these products. As more therapeutic probiotics are developed, changes to existing regulatory process in the United States may be required to meet the needs of patients and users in the population. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases view the regulation of probiotics. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site qualitative study consisting of focus groups of patients with chronic gastrointestinal diseases at three tertiary hospitals: at [institutions removed for blinded review]. RESULTS: We conducted 22 focus groups with 136 patients with major gastrointestinal (GI) diseases between March and August 2009. Participants were not familiar with the existing regulation of probiotic products but wanted assurances of accurate labelling of strain as well as safety. Participants raised concerns that regulation of probiotics might be accompanied by greater costs, reduced access and increased involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Although participants voiced significant doubt of government regulators, they felt that products containing genetically modified probiotic strains should have oversight comparable to that of pharmaceutical drugs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: If GIpatient perspectives are indicative of public perceptions of therapeutic probiotics in the United States, consumers may expect more rigorous regulation in the future while simultaneously wanting low costs, easy access and low involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Manufacturers, translational scientists, clinicians and regulators should be sensitive to consumer attitudes when designing, testing and regulating new therapeutic probiotics.
Authors: Peter J Turnbaugh; Ruth E Ley; Micah Hamady; Claire M Fraser-Liggett; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Nature Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: MaryBeth Mercer; Margaret A Brinich; Gail Geller; Krista Harrison; Janelle Highland; Katherine James; Patricia Marshall; Jennifer B McCormick; Jon Tilburt; Jean-Paul Achkar; Ruth M Farrell; Richard R Sharp Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Taylor C Wallace; Francisco Guarner; Karen Madsen; Michael D Cabana; Glenn Gibson; Eric Hentges; Mary Ellen Sanders Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Tracy M Frech; Dinesh Khanna; Paul Maranian; Edward J Frech; Allen D Sawitzke; Maureen A Murtaugh Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Sarah L Bridgman; Meghan B Azad; Catherine J Field; Nicole Letourneau; David W Johnston; Bonnie J Kaplan; Anita L Kozyrskyj Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: David Schnadower; Phillip I Tarr; T Charles Casper; Marc H Gorelick; Michael J Dean; Karen J O'Connell; Prashant Mahajan; Thomas H Chun; Seema R Bhatt; Cindy G Roskind; Elizabeth C Powell; Alexander J Rogers; Cheryl Vance; Robert E Sapien; Feng Gao; Stephen B Freedman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692