Literature DB >> 23278925

Do subitizing deficits in developmental dyscalculia involve pattern recognition weakness?

Sarit Ashkenazi1, Nitza Mark-Zigdon, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

The abilities of children diagnosed with developmental dyscalculia (DD) were examined in two types of object enumeration: subitizing, and small estimation (5-9 dots). Subitizing is usually defined as a fast and accurate assessment of a number of small dots (range 1 to 4 dots), and estimation is an imprecise process to assess a large number of items (range 5 dots or more). Based on reaction time (RT) and accuracy analysis, our results indicated a deficit in the subitizing and small estimation range among DD participants in relation to controls. There are indications that subitizing is based on pattern recognition, thus presenting dots in a canonical shape in the estimation range should result in a subitizing-like pattern. In line with this theory, our control group presented a subitizing-like pattern in the small estimation range for canonically arranged dots, whereas the DD participants presented a deficit in the estimation of canonically arranged dots. The present finding indicates that pattern recognition difficulties may play a significant role in both subitizing and subitizing deficits among those with DD.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23278925     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  11 in total

1.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyscalculia.

Authors:  Stefan Haberstroh; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally.

Authors:  Clare S Major; Jacob M Paul; Robert A Reeve
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-22

3.  Heterogeneity of Developmental Dyscalculia: Cases with Different Deficit Profiles.

Authors:  Ulf Träff; Linda Olsson; Rickard Östergren; Kenny Skagerlund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-04

4.  Spatial Arrangement and Set Size Influence the Coding of Non-symbolic Quantities in the Intraparietal Sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Bloechle; Julia F Huber; Elise Klein; Julia Bahnmueller; Johannes Rennig; Korbinian Moeller; Stefan Huber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Cognitive Profile of Math Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical Criteria.

Authors:  Stefan Haberstroh; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 6.  Iconic Mathematics: Math Designed to Suit the Mind.

Authors:  Peter Kramer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Spatial and chromatic properties of numerosity estimation in isolation and context.

Authors:  Elena Gheorghiu; Dirk Goldschmitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Ratio dependence in small number discrimination is affected by the experimental procedure.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Laura Piffer; Angelo Bisazza; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-29

9.  Alerting cues enhance the subitizing process.

Authors:  Yarden Gliksman; Noam Weinbach; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-07-14

Review 10.  Developmental brain dynamics of numerical and arithmetic abilities.

Authors:  Stephan E Vogel; Bert De Smedt
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.