Literature DB >> 23278884

Safety and predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy for milk allergy: severity of reaction at oral challenge, specific IgE and prick test.

M Vázquez-Ortiz1, M Alvaro-Lozano, L Alsina, M B Garcia-Paba, M Piquer-Gibert, M T Giner-Muñoz, J Lozano, O Domínguez-Sánchez, R Jiménez, M Días, M A Martín-Mateos, A M Plaza-Martín.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strict avoidance is the only accepted management for cow's milk (CM) allergy. CM oral immunotherapy (CM-OIT) is under investigation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term safety of CM-OIT. To identify clinical/immunological predictors of adverse events.
METHODS: Prospective longitudinal epidemiological intervention study. CM-allergic children aged 5-18 underwent a Spanish-approved CM-OIT protocol without premedication. Clinical data, skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) at baseline and 1 year after OIT were registered. All dose-related reactions, treatments needed and cofactors involved were recorded. Through survival analysis, we studied the cumulative probability of reactions resolution over time and clinical/immunological risk factors of reactions persistence.
RESULTS: 81 children were recruited. Mean follow-up was 25 months. 95% of children suffered reactions, 91% of which affected a single organ. Reactions were heterogeneously distributed: (a) 60 children (75%) had occasional symptoms which ceased over time. 86% of them reached complete desensitization (200 mL). (b) 20 children (25%) suffered frequent (78% of total reactions), more severe and unpredictable reactions, which persisted during follow-up or led to withdrawal (6 cases). Reactions persistence was associated with a higher frequency and severity. Kaplan-Meier estimate revealed a cumulative probability of reactions resolution of 25% at 3 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.1) and 50% (95% CI: 6.1-9.9) at 8 months based on all patients. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression model identified 3 variables (CM-sIgE ≥ 50 KU L(-1) , CM-SPT ≥ 9 mm and Sampson's severity grades 2, 3 and 4 at baseline food challenge) as independent risk factors of reactions persistence. The combination of 2 or 3 of these factors involved hazard ratios to develop persistent reactions of 2.26 (95% CI: 1.14-4.46; P = 0.019) and 6.06 (95% CI: 2.7-13.7; P < 0.001), respectively. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CM-OIT was insufficiently safe in 25% of children. The above-mentioned clinical and immunological parameters would help clinicians to identify highly reactive patients before CM-OIT. In them, individualized schedules and premedication should be considered.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23278884     DOI: 10.1111/cea.12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  31 in total

Review 1.  Oral and Sublingual Immunotherapy for Treatment of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy.

Authors:  Amy M Scurlock
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Reply to correspondence letter by M. Korppi.

Authors:  Montserrat Álvaro; Ma Teresa Giner; Marta Vázquez; Jaime Lozano; Olga Domínguez; Mónica Piquer; Marcia Días; Rosa Jiménez; Ma Anunciación Martín; Laia Alsina; Ana Ma Plaza
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Novel baseline predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy.

Authors:  Yamini V Virkud; A Wesley Burks; Pamela H Steele; Lloyd J Edwards; Jelena P Berglund; Stacie M Jones; Amy M Scurlock; Tamara T Perry; Robert D Pesek; Brian P Vickery
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  An Examination of Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes in Food Allergen Immunotherapy by Route of Administration.

Authors:  David Chiang; M Cecilia Berin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Use of IgE and IgG4 epitope binding to predict the outcome of oral immunotherapy in cow's milk allergy.

Authors:  Emma M Savilahti; Mikael Kuitunen; Miko Valori; Ville Rantanen; Ludmilla Bardina; Gustavo Gimenez; Mika J Mäkelä; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Erkki Savilahti; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.377

Review 6.  Emerging therapies for food allergy.

Authors:  Corinne A Keet; Robert A Wood
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Oral immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy.

Authors:  Philippe Begin; R Sharon Chinthrajah; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Current and Emerging Therapies for IgE-Mediated Food Allergy.

Authors:  Robbie D Pesek; Stacie M Jones
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 9.  Food allergy diagnosis and therapy: where are we now?

Authors:  Aleena Syed; Arunima Kohli; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Omalizumab facilitates rapid oral desensitization for peanut allergy.

Authors:  Andrew J MacGinnitie; Rima Rachid; Hana Gragg; Sara V Little; Paul Lakin; Antonella Cianferoni; Jennifer Heimall; Melanie Makhija; Rachel Robison; R Sharon Chinthrajah; John Lee; Jennifer Lebovidge; Tina Dominguez; Courtney Rooney; Megan Ott Lewis; Jennifer Koss; Elizabeth Burke-Roberts; Kimberly Chin; Tanya Logvinenko; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Dale T Umetsu; Jonathan Spergel; Kari C Nadeau; Lynda C Schneider
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.