Literature DB >> 2327881

Kinematics of high-heeled gait.

K A Opila-Correia1.   

Abstract

High-heeled shoes cause postural changes, a loss in foot function, and increased shock loadings during gait, which must be compensated by accommodations in the kinematics of body segments proximal to the feet. The hypothesis tested in this study was that there are differences in the three-dimensional kinematics of the tibia, knee, hip, pelvis, trunk, and upper trunk between low-heeled and high-heeled gait. Gait analysis of 14 subjects showed that during high-heeled gait subjects walked more slowly (p less than .001), had shorter stride lengths (p less than .001), and had higher stance time percentages (p less than .05). Kinematically, high-heeled gait compared to low-heeled gait, was characterized by significantly increased knee flexion at heelstrike (5.4 degrees vs 2.1 degrees, p less than .05) and during stance phase (22.6 degrees vs 19.2 degrees, p less than .05). During swing phase, high-heeled gait, compared to low-heeled gait, resulted in significantly lower knee flexion (66.1 degrees vs 72.1 degrees, p less than .05) and hip flexion (33.5 degrees vs 34.8 degrees, p less than .05). The range of motion of the pelvis in the sagittal plane was slightly lower in high-heeled gait than in low-heeled gait (7.0 degrees vs 7.9 degrees, p less than .05). No significant differences between low-heeled and high-heeled gait were found in the motions of the pelvis and trunk in the frontal and transverse planes. Statistical tests of intrasubject variability of angles of gait showed that five repeated trials were adequate for analysis of the tibia and knee in all planes of motion and for the hip in frontal and transverse planes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2327881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  The effect of an inclined landing surface on biomechanical variables during a jumping task.

Authors:  Marshall Hagins; Evangelos Pappas; Ian Kremenic; Karl F Orishimo; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The influence of heel height on sagittal plane knee kinematics during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps; Robroy L Martin; Anne M Burrows
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

3.  The influence of heel height on vertical ground reaction force during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-02

Review 4.  The goal of locomotion: Separating the fundamental task from the mechanisms that accomplish it.

Authors:  James L Croft; Ryan T Schroeder; John E A Bertram
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

5.  High-heeled-related alterations in the static sagittal profile of the spino-pelvic structure in young women.

Authors:  Min Dai; Xiaofeng Li; Xin Zhou; Yiqiang Hu; Qiang Luo; Song Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Movement behavior of high-heeled walking: how does the nervous system control the ankle joint during an unstable walking condition?

Authors:  Tine Alkjær; Peter Raffalt; Nicolas C Petersen; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Forward Dynamic Modelling Investigation of Cause-and-Effect Relationships in Single Support Phase of Human Walking.

Authors:  Michael McGrath; David Howard; Richard Baker
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  The Effects of Lower Extremity Angle According to Heel-height Changes in Young Ladies in Their 20s during Gait.

Authors:  ChangRyeol Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-07-30

9.  Non-fatal occupational falls on the same level.

Authors:  Han T Yeoh; Thurmon E Lockhart; Xuefang Wu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.